Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RC bugs

Le 19/02/2019 à 07:40, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 2:50 AM, Xavier wrote: >> Le 18/02/2019 à 21:20, Xavier a écrit : >>>  Le 18/02/2019 à 20:46, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :  Le lun. 18 févr. 2019 à 19:17, Xavier >>>  > a écrit : >>

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#896468: Bug#896468: Bug#896468: Bug#896468: libjs-chartjs: Please upload newer versions

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 1:55 AM, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi Pirate, On 17-02-2019 11:51, Pirate Praveen wrote: Thanks Paul for testing. The missing dependencies were treated as external dependencies by rollup (webpack would give an error), would have worked in node, but not in browser. I embed

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RC bugs

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 2:50 AM, Xavier wrote: Le 18/02/2019 à 21:20, Xavier a écrit : Le 18/02/2019 à 20:46, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : Le lun. 18 févr. 2019 à 19:17, Xavier mailto:x.guim...@free.fr>> a écrit : Le 18/02/2019 à 17:46, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > > > O

[Pkg-javascript-devel] v8 drops support on mips

Let's cross fingers that someone will maintain a workable fork of v8/node: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/26179 Jérémy -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processed: reopening 917295

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 917295 Bug #917295 {Done: Xavier Guimard } [libjs-mocha] [libjs-mocha] Use browserify 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them. Bug reopene

[Pkg-javascript-devel] codemirror-js_5.43.0-1_sourceonly.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 22:31:01 +0100 Source: codemirror-js Binary: libjs-codemirror Architecture: source Version: 5.43.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers Changed-By: Gordon

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of codemirror-js_5.43.0-1_sourceonly.changes

codemirror-js_5.43.0-1_sourceonly.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: codemirror-js_5.43.0-1.dsc codemirror-js_5.43.0.orig.tar.gz codemirror-js_5.43.0-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) -- Pkg-javascr

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] libnode *might* need abi bump related to openssl 1.1.1 api break... or not...

On 2019-02-18 11:08:30 [+0100], Jérémy Lal wrote: > hi ! Hi, > It happens that that api breakage has been reverted and is merged in > openssl 1.1.1 stable branch: > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/37857e9b5258da148e5d3699b6acdf8787417eb2 > > If openssl releases this and the release goes

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RC bugs

Le 18/02/2019 à 21:20, Xavier a écrit : > Le 18/02/2019 à 20:46, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : >> >> Le lun. 18 févr. 2019 à 19:17, Xavier > > a écrit : >> >> Le 18/02/2019 à 17:46, Pirate Praveen a écrit : >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:50 PM, Xav

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#917295: marked as done ([libjs-mocha] Use browserify)

Your message dated Mon, 18 Feb 2019 20:44:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#917295: fixed in node-mocha 4.1.0+ds3-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #917295, regarding [libjs-mocha] Use browserify to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#921798: marked as done (node-mocha: FTBFS (Module not found: Error: Recursion in resolving))

Your message dated Mon, 18 Feb 2019 20:44:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#921798: fixed in node-mocha 4.1.0+ds3-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #921798, regarding node-mocha: FTBFS (Module not found: Error: Recursion in resolving) to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-mocha_4.1.0+ds3-4_sourceonly.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 21:02:00 +0100 Source: node-mocha Binary: mocha Architecture: source Version: 4.1.0+ds3-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers Changed-By: Xavier Guimard C

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-mocha_4.1.0+ds3-4_sourceonly.changes

node-mocha_4.1.0+ds3-4_sourceonly.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: node-mocha_4.1.0+ds3-4.dsc node-mocha_4.1.0+ds3-4.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascri

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#896468: Bug#896468: Bug#896468: libjs-chartjs: Please upload newer versions

Hi Pirate, On 17-02-2019 11:51, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Thanks Paul for testing. The missing dependencies were treated as > external dependencies by rollup (webpack would give an error), would > have worked in node, but not in browser. I embedded the missing > dependencies and also used rollup-plu

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RC bugs

Le 18/02/2019 à 20:46, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > > Le lun. 18 févr. 2019 à 19:17, Xavier > a écrit : > > Le 18/02/2019 à 17:46, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:50 PM, Xavier > wrote: >

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RC bugs

Le lun. 18 févr. 2019 à 19:17, Xavier a écrit : > Le 18/02/2019 à 17:46, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:50 PM, Xavier wrote: > >> - node-mocha: #921798: FTBFS (Module not found: Error: Recursion in > >>resolving) > > > > I tried to use rollup instead of webp

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-setimmediate_1.0.5-4_sourceonly.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 18:59:29 +0100 Source: node-setimmediate Binary: node-setimmediate Architecture: source Version: 1.0.5-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers Changed-By: Xa

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-setimmediate_1.0.5-4_sourceonly.changes

node-setimmediate_1.0.5-4_sourceonly.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: node-setimmediate_1.0.5-4.dsc node-setimmediate_1.0.5-4.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RC bugs

Le 18/02/2019 à 17:46, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:50 PM, Xavier wrote: >>  - node-mocha: #921798: FTBFS (Module not found: Error: Recursion in >>    resolving) > > I tried to use rollup instead of webpack (in rollup branch), it builds > fine, but will not work in

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RC bugs

Le 18/02/2019 à 17:46, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:50 PM, Xavier wrote: >>  - node-mocha: #921798: FTBFS (Module not found: Error: Recursion in >>    resolving) > > I tried to use rollup instead of webpack (in rollup branch), it builds > fine, but will not work in

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RC bugs

On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:50 PM, Xavier wrote: - node-mocha: #921798: FTBFS (Module not found: Error: Recursion in resolving) I tried to use rollup instead of webpack (in rollup branch), it builds fine, but will not work in a browser (should be enough for node). If we cannot fix thr r

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#890575: marked as done (node-lodash: CVE-2018-3721: Prototype pollution in utilities function)

Your message dated Mon, 18 Feb 2019 15:56:07 +0100 with message-id and subject line Fwd: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#890575: Fixed in lodash 4.17.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #890575, regarding node-lodash: CVE-2018-3721: Prototype pollution in utilities function to be marked as done. This m

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#890575: Fixed

Control: fixed -1 debian/4.17.11+dfsg-1 This vulnerability (CVE-2018-3721) has been fixed in lodash 4.17.5. Cheers, Xavier -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processed: Fixed

Processing control commands: > fixed -1 debian/4.17.11+dfsg-1 Bug #890575 [src:node-lodash] node-lodash: CVE-2018-3721: Prototype pollution in utilities function The source debian and version 4.17.11+dfsg-1 do not appear to match any binary packages Marked as fixed in versions debian/4.17.11+dfs

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processed: Fixed in lodash 4.17.5

Processing control commands: > fixed -1 4.17.11+dfsg-1 Bug #890575 [src:node-lodash] node-lodash: CVE-2018-3721: Prototype pollution in utilities function Marked as fixed in versions node-lodash/4.17.11+dfsg-1. -- 890575: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=890575 Debian Bug Track

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#890575: Fixed in lodash 4.17.5

Control: fixed -1 4.17.11+dfsg-1 CVE-2018-3721 has been fixed in lodash 4.17.5. Cheers, Xavier -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-lodash_4.17.11+dfsg-2_amd64.changesACCEPTED into unstable

On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 5:57 PM, Xavier wrote: I think we should make a ROM-RM to src:node-lodash-packages Only after this version migrates to testing, else it will be blocked by freeze as new binary package. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.n

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-lodash_4.17.11+dfsg-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

I think we should make a ROM-RM to src:node-lodash-packages Le 18/02/2019 à 11:23, Debian FTP Masters a écrit : > > > Accepted: > > Format: 1.8 > Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 15:31:23 +0530 > Source: node-lodash > Binary: libjs-lodash node-lodash node-lodash-packages > Architecture: source all > Vers

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#873016: marked as done (node-lodash-packages: not preferred form for source: Should be built from node-lodash)

Your message dated Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:23:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#873016: fixed in node-lodash 4.17.11+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #873016, regarding node-lodash-packages: not preferred form for source: Should be built from node-lodash to be marked as done. This

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-lodash_4.17.11+dfsg-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 15:31:23 +0530 Source: node-lodash Binary: libjs-lodash node-lodash node-lodash-packages Architecture: source all Version: 4.17.11+dfsg-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Javasc

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-lodash_4.17.11+dfsg-2_amd64.changes

node-lodash_4.17.11+dfsg-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: node-lodash_4.17.11+dfsg-2.dsc node-lodash_4.17.11+dfsg-2.debian.tar.xz libjs-lodash_4.17.11+dfsg-2_all.deb node-lodash-packages_4.17.11+dfsg-2_all.deb node-lodash_4.17.11+dfsg-2_all.deb no

[Pkg-javascript-devel] libnode *might* need abi bump related to openssl 1.1.1 api break... or not...

hi ! Nodejs c++ addons (modules) in buster are built using libnode-dev - a great improvement over previous "situation". However upstream libnode embeds its dependencies, whereas almost all debian libnode dependencies are shared. Modules authors expect a given node ABI to offer the same versions, o

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] ?==?utf-8?q? RC bugs

Le Lundi, Février 18, 2019 10:40 CET, Pirate Praveen a écrit: > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 11:29 AM, Xavier wrote: > > - node-lodash-packages: > > - #873016: not preferred form for source: Should be built from > >node-lodash > > I have fixed it locally, I will upload

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RC bugs

On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 11:29 AM, Xavier wrote: - node-lodash-packages: - #873016: not preferred form for source: Should be built from node-lodash I have fixed it locally, I will upload soon. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian