Bug#876521: FTBFS with CGAL 4.11

2018-03-15 Thread Bas Couwenberg
On 2018-03-15 14:35, Vincas Dargis wrote: There is new PR, does this fix the issue? https://github.com/Oslandia/SFCGAL/pull/157 No, see: https://github.com/Oslandia/SFCGAL/pull/157#issuecomment-373383973 Kind Regards, Bas ___ Pkg-grass-devel mai

Bug#876521: FTBFS with CGAL 4.11

2018-03-15 Thread Vincas Dargis
There is new PR, does this fix the issue? https://github.com/Oslandia/SFCGAL/pull/157 ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel

Bug#876521: FTBFS with CGAL 4.11

2017-11-30 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Joachim, On 11/30/2017 08:11 PM, Joachim Reichel wrote: > On 12.11.2017 22:20, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> You shouldn't have waited for this issue to request the transition slot. >> As I said before, I'll remove the SFCGAL dependency from PostGIS if this >> issue is not resolved when the C

Processed: Re: Bug#876521: FTBFS with CGAL 4.11

2017-11-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 876521 serious Bug #876521 [src:sfcgal] FTBFS with CGAL 4.11 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 876521: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg

Bug#876521: FTBFS with CGAL 4.11

2017-11-30 Thread Joachim Reichel
severity 876521 serious thanks On 12.11.2017 22:20, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > You shouldn't have waited for this issue to request the transition slot. > As I said before, I'll remove the SFCGAL dependency from PostGIS if this > issue is not resolved when the CGAL transition starts. That way w

Bug#876521: FTBFS with CGAL 4.11

2017-11-12 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Joachim, On 11/12/2017 09:33 PM, Joachim Reichel wrote: > any news here? SFCGAL is now the only remaining reverse dependency that > affects > the upload of CGAL 4.11. No news, upstream commented in the issue twice but that died down since. > Unless you have information that changes the pictu

Bug#876521: FTBFS with CGAL 4.11

2017-11-12 Thread Joachim Reichel
Hi Sebastiaan, any news here? SFCGAL is now the only remaining reverse dependency that affects the upload of CGAL 4.11. Unless you have information that changes the picture in the near-term future I would like to go on and request a transition slot for CGAL 4.11. Kind regards, Joachim ___

Processed: Re: Bug#876521: FTBFS with CGAL 4.11

2017-09-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #876521 [src:sfcgal] FTBFS with CGAL 4.11 Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > forwarded -1 https://github.com/Oslandia/SFCGAL/issues/145 Bug #876521 [src:sfcgal] FTBFS with CGAL 4.11 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.c

Bug#876521: FTBFS with CGAL 4.11

2017-09-23 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Control: severity -1 important Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/Oslandia/SFCGAL/issues/145 Hi Joachim, On 09/23/2017 11:21 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 09/23/2017 11:15 AM, Joachim Reichel wrote: >> I would like to upgrade CGAL from 4.9 to 4.11 but if I do so your package >> FTBF

Bug#876521: FTBFS with CGAL 4.11

2017-09-23 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 09/23/2017 11:15 AM, Joachim Reichel wrote: > I would like to upgrade CGAL from 4.9 to 4.11 but if I do so your package > FTBFS. Therefore (and because of the SONAME transition), CGAL 4.11 has been > uploaded to experimental for now instead of sid. SFCGAL 1.3.2 is available in git and requires

Bug#876521: FTBFS with CGAL 4.11

2017-09-23 Thread Joachim Reichel
Source: sfcgal Severity: serious Tags: upstream Hi, I would like to upgrade CGAL from 4.9 to 4.11 but if I do so your package FTBFS. Therefore (and because of the SONAME transition), CGAL 4.11 has been uploaded to experimental for now instead of sid. Attached is an excerpt from the build log wit