Control: severity -1 normal
Control: retitle -1 liblas: should update symbols files for GCC 5
this builds with boost1.58, but could use an update for the symbols files
___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists
On 29 June 2015 at 23:19, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On 29 June 2015 at 17:11, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> Also please study the attached successful build log in experimental,
> and let me know if there are any issues with it.
>
and it's bogus =) it's building with 4.9 toolchain.
On 29 June 2015 at 17:11, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> Control: reopen -1
>> Control: severity -1 important
>>
>> On 06/28/2015 12:51 AM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>>> Using -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0 allows liblas to build with GCC 5
>>> indeed.
>>
>> the goal should be to build everyt
> Control: reopen -1
> Control: severity -1 important
>
> On 06/28/2015 12:51 AM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>> Using -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0 allows liblas to build with GCC 5
>> indeed.
>
> the goal should be to build everything using the new ABI, especially if
> this is
> a library pack
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #777955 {Done: Sebastiaan Couwenberg } [src:liblas]
liblas: ftbfs with GCC-5
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #777955 to the same values
previously set
> severity -1 important
Bug #777955 [src:liblas] liblas: ftbfs with GCC
Control: reopen -1
Control: severity -1 important
On 06/28/2015 12:51 AM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Using -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0 allows liblas to build with GCC 5 indeed.
the goal should be to build everything using the new ABI, especially if this is
a library package.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 777955 liblas/1.8.0-1
Bug #777955 [src:liblas] liblas: ftbfs with GCC-5
No longer marked as found in versions liblas/1.8.0-1.
> tags 777955 - confirmed
Bug #777955 [src:liblas] liblas: ftbfs with GCC-5
Removed tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
S
failure to link is fine, as that's the libstdc++ library transition
problem. and indeed we will need to binNMU things in order to
transition to the new ABI.
This bug report is about the compile failure, rather than the link failure.
One can either locally recompile everything with the new ABI, or
Hi Matthias,
On 02/13/2015 10:48 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> This looks like looks like #778220.
The boost issue (#778220) is no longer a problem.
But unfortunately liblas still fails to build with GCC 5, now due to
undefined references to Boost methods. See for example this build log:
h
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #777955 [src:liblas] liblas: ftbfs with GCC-5
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> block -1 by 778220
Bug #777955 [src:liblas] liblas: ftbfs with GCC-5
777955 was not blocked by any bugs.
777955 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 777955: 7
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Control: block -1 by 778220
Hi Matthias,
Thanks for your work on GCC 5. I can confirm the FTBFS.
On 02/12/2015 11:33 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> /«PKGBUILDDIR»/src/../include/liblas/external/property_tree/detail/xml_parser_write.hpp:72:48:
> warning: typedef 'Str' l
Package: src:liblas
Version: 1.8.0-1
Severity: normal
Tags: sid stretch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-5
Please keep this issue open in the bug tracker for the package it
was filed for. If a fix in another package is required, please
file a bug for the other package (or clo
12 matches
Mail list logo
