Re: Status of Peter Van Eynde's packages

2016-11-28 Thread pvaneynd
Hello Andrey, > There is a bunch of packages maintained by Peter that are RC-buggy for 7 > months and didn't have a maintainer upload for 7 years or more. If they Ups. Sorry this fell through the (gigantic) cracks. I was mostly watching cmucl/clisp and didn’t notice cltl having problem. I’m upl

Re: GNU libsigsegv 2.11 is released

2017-03-01 Thread pvaneynd
Hello Bruno, Thanks for your email. Unfortunately Debian has just entered the ‘freeze’ period: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2017/02/msg1.html Uploading a new library to unstable at this time is "not a

Re: new clisp packages

2017-06-20 Thread pvaneynd
Hello Norbert, > I have taken the liberty to prepare a package, as reference, of > the latest 2.49.51 version: Oh great! I know that the clisp people are working hard on releasing a new version ‘soon’ so I’ll start making snapshot packages, I’ll of course try to integrate your work too. Thanks

Re: new clisp packages

2017-06-20 Thread pvaneynd
Hi Christoph, Replying sans Norbert. I tried updating libsigsegv and clisp to newer versions but I noticed that the git repository layout is different now and doesn’t seem to follow https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianCommonLisp/GitPackaging anymore. I notice that there are upstreams in the g

Re: new clisp packages

2017-06-30 Thread pvaneynd
Hello Norbert, Christoph hasn’t replied yet, so I’m going forward on packaging the new clisp/libsigsegv. Real life however means that I probably can send out an update and then go offline for a month or so. Best regards, Peter smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature _

Re: new clisp packages

2017-06-30 Thread pvaneynd
Hello Norbert, >> Christoph hasn’t replied yet, so I’m going forward on packaging the new >> clisp/libsigsegv. Real life however means that I probably can send out an >> update and then go offline for a month or so. > > If you let me join I can do some work, too. There is 2.49.60 out. > So in c

Re: New Common Lisp wiki page

2017-08-29 Thread pvaneynd
Hello Sébastien, > I took some time to fully rewrite the Common Lisp page on the Debian wiki: > > https://wiki.debian.org/CommonLisp I like it! Two comments however: - I would steer newbies to clisp instead of ECL on platforms which don’t support SBCL… - pa

Re: Migration to salsa.d.o + git workflow

2018-01-02 Thread pvaneynd
Hello all, > I have created a group for the Debian Common Lisp Team (see [3]), and I have > added Peter, Christoph, Tobias and myself as owners. Please let me know if I > should add other DDs. For those of you who are not DDs, you have to create an > account on salsa, and request to join the grou

Re: Migration to salsa.d.o + git workflow

2018-01-05 Thread pvaneynd
Hello Sébastien, > The most convenient way of stripping DFSG-files is the "Files-Excluded:" field > in debian/copyright, when the latter is written in machine-readable format. > This field is understood by uscan (in conjunction with some special magic in > debian/watch for mangling the +dfsg suffi

Re: The future of our mailing lists

2018-01-09 Thread pvaneynd
Hello Sébastien, I would prefer to have an official mailing list for the discussion, as this is our main method of communicating. If that fails then we would wait for the main alias on tracker I guess. I would prefer to have one ML both for communication and as maintainer field. Best regards,

Re: The future of our mailing lists

2018-01-29 Thread pvaneynd
Hello Sébastien and co, Following the announcement of alioth-lists.debian.net I got emails for pkg-common-lisp-comm...@lists.alioth.debian.org and pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org