Bug#886986: please remove bump-fasl-loader-version.patch

2018-01-12 Thread Sam Steingold
ort will ever be saved by upgrading CLISP and checking that the existing image is compatible with the new CLISP. It is safer and cleaner to _always_ re-dump the MEM file from FAS.gz distributed with the package. I think this is what Bruno meant by his ls.so analogy. Thanks. -- Sam Steingold (

Bug#433592: clisp: Float/rational comparison sometimes underflows; should never

2008-07-09 Thread Sam Steingold
this is not debian-related. this is an upstream bug https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2014262&group_id=1355&atid=101355 which has now been fixed in the CVS. it will be available in clisp 2.47 in the future, please report such bugs directly to us using the SF bug tracker. th

Bug#433596: clisp: Stack overflow taking rational values of extreme long-floats

2008-07-10 Thread Sam Steingold
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101355&aid=2015118&group_id=1355 the bug is now fixed: an arithmetic-error is signaled instead of a stack overflow. 2.47 will include this fix. ___ pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list pkg-common-lisp-

Bug#443520: clisp: Error on startup "invalid byte #xC3 in CHARSET:ASCII conversion"

2008-07-10 Thread Sam Steingold
this bug has been fixed in clisp cvs head and will be available in 2.47. ___ pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-common-lisp-devel

Bug#443520: clisp: Error on startup "invalid byte #xC3 in CHARSET:ASCII conversion"

2008-07-14 Thread Sam Steingold
Luca Capello wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:01:10 +0200, Sam Steingold wrote: >> this bug has been fixed in clisp cvs head and will be available in >> 2.47. > > Thank you Sam! For information's sake, I guess this is reflected by the > following ChangeLog

Bug#462088: clisp: create C files with missing includes

2008-07-15 Thread Sam Steingold
I cannot try this because I do not have ordrules.h, but I don't see how this can happen: the line register_foreign_inttype("tcflag_t",sizeof(tcflag_t),(tcflag_t)-1<=(tcflag_t)0); is generated by (def-c-type tcflag_t) and there is no such line in the lisp file you attach. please file a clisp b

Bug#358070: clisp: FTBFS/please support mips64: includes mips(32) file

2008-07-15 Thread Sam Steingold
src/makemake.in detects mips64, so it creates arimips64.c (as is clear from your log) not arimips.c. please try to run in full 64-bit mode or full 32-bit mode. ___ pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http:/

Bug#462087: clisp-dev: Includes unnecessary library references

2008-07-15 Thread Sam Steingold
$ grep X_PRE_ config.log X_PRE_LIBS=' -lSM -lICE' X_PRE_LIBS is set by the standard autoconf macro AC_PATH_XTRA, invoked by modules/clx/new-clx/configure if you want, you can try to replace AC_PATH_XTRA with AC_PATH_X, regenerate configures &c and see if it still works. _

Bug#462087: clisp-dev: Includes unnecessary library references

2008-07-20 Thread Sam Steingold
> * Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-20 21:48:29 +0200]: > > On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:54:13 +0200, Sam Steingold wrote: >> $ grep X_PRE_ config.log >> X_PRE_LIBS=' -lSM -lICE' >> >> X_PRE_LIBS is set by the standard autoconf macro AC_PATH_

debian clisp package

2008-10-24 Thread Sam Steingold
Hi, now that clisp 2.47 has been released, you are 3 releases behind. :-) A couple notes about the debian package: 1. README.Debian says "In order to use the "disassemble" function you must install gdb". this is NOT true. gdb is only necessary to disassemble functions written in C, e.g., car. f

Bug#504514: unnecessary dependencies in clisp-dev

2008-11-04 Thread Sam Steingold
Package: clisp-dev Version: 1:2.44.1-4.1 http://packages.debian.org/sid/clisp-dev lists far too many dependencies. clisp-dev does not require a specific gcc version. all it needs is some C compiler, not necessarily the one which was used to build clisp there is absolutely no need for bison, deb

Re: debian clisp package

2008-11-04 Thread Sam Steingold
> BTW, I read the pkg-common-lisp mailing list on a regular basis, so you > do not need to cc: me. I don't think my mails there are accepted. (do I have to be subscribed? if yes, can I disable delivery and read it on gmane?) > On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:50:39 +0200, Sam Steingold wrot

Bug#504514: [Debian] clisp-dev dependencies (was Re: debian clisp package)

2008-11-05 Thread Sam Steingold
y planned to solve this issue splitting >the Debian clisp package into clisp-base and clisp-full, but I have >not had time yet :-( > > 2) makevars wants to include all of the libraries listed in clisp-dev >Depends:, that is why these libraries are, in the Debian world, >

Bug#177057: [Debian] clisp base/full linking sets

2008-11-23 Thread Sam Steingold
ea for debian to follow those suggestions. I am mostly concerned with "offering a uniform experience to all CLISP users regardless of platform or distribution". >>> Footnotes: >>> [4] http://bugs.debian.org/177057 >>> [5] http://bugs.debian.org/462085 --

Bug#177057: [Debian] clisp base/full linking sets

2008-12-09 Thread Sam Steingold
Hi Luca, Luca Capello wrote: > On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:09:15 +0100, Sam Steingold wrote: > >> you might also build clisp with dynamic modules and offer individual >> modules a la carte. > > While my previous point is still valid, thank you for the hint: I have > neve

Bug#511025: 32-bit binaries distributed on 64-bit platforms

2009-01-06 Thread Sam Steingold
Package: libsigsegv-dev Version: 2.5-2 on dual-arch systems, specifically, on sparc (but possibly others), libsigsegv.so is distributed in a 32-bit variant, not 64-bit variant: /usr/lib/libsigsegv.so.0.0.0: ELF 32-bit MSB shared object, SPARC32PLUS, V8+ Required, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically li

Bug#511025:

2009-01-06 Thread Sam Steingold
see also http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511024 -- Sam Steingold ___ pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-common-lisp-devel

Bug#177057: Redoing the clisp package, advice wanted

2010-08-17 Thread Sam Steingold
move "full" (b) place directory "modname/" and files "dynmod/*modname*" into the "clisp-modname" package (c) place the rest into the "clisp" package. Alternatively, pass '--with-module=rawsock --with-module=... ....' to the top-level configu

Bug#177057: Redoing the clisp package, advice wanted

2010-08-17 Thread Sam Steingold
OK, I fixed clisp-link.in and makemake.in (get them from CVS). The relevant part of unix/INSTALL now reads: == 3. Binary package creation: we recommend distributing module "clisp" containing just the base linking set and individual modules packaged sep

Bug#504514: closed by Peter Van Eynde (Bug#504514: fixed in clisp 1:2.49-1)

2010-10-28 Thread Sam Steingold
1:2.49-1 > Source: clisp > Source-Version: 1:2.49-1 -- Sam Steingold <http://sds.podval.org> ___ pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-common-lisp-devel