Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # not affecting/relevant for stable
> tags 546976 + squeeze sid
Bug #546976 {Done: Barry deFreese } [rezound] rezound:
fox1.4 Removed, please update to fox1.6
Added tag(s) sid and squeeze.
> tags 547463 + squeeze sid
Bug #547463 {Done: Randall Do
FYI: The status of the slime source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:20100605-1
Current version: 1:20100722-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
Hi Luca!
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 03:33, Luca Capello wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> Thanks to DebConf10, I am catching up with my huge mail backlog, which
> (obviously) includes pkg-common-lisp as well.
>
> On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 22:31 +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote:
>> The team is inactive now. People's b
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 23:17, Faré wrote:
> I tried to upload a cl-asdf that removes the dependency, but failed.
>
> 1- with the new ASDF2, do we really need to register source anymore, anyway?
> It should already be registered, being in the correct location that's
> registered by default.
>
> 2-
On 2 August 2010 23:05, Desmond O. Chang wrote:
> The cl-asdf dependency of c-l-c is hardcoded in debian/control, the
> c-l-c dependency of cl-asdf is generated by dh_lisp when building.
>
> Installing c-l-c does not depend on cl-asdf, but its code depends.
>
Apparently, all dh_lisp does for sourc
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 12:14, Faré wrote:
> On 2 August 2010 23:05, Desmond O. Chang wrote:
>> The cl-asdf dependency of c-l-c is hardcoded in debian/control, the
>> c-l-c dependency of cl-asdf is generated by dh_lisp when building.
>>
>> Installing c-l-c does not depend on cl-asdf, but its code
