Do we need an unofficial debian repository?

2010-07-12 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Hi all, The team is inactive now. People's bugreports and patches don't get any response. Many packages have been removed, many are out of date. I think the slow and complicated uploading process is why the team lacks contributors. Shall we need an unofficial repo like emacs.orebokech.com to re

Re: UNS: Do we need an unofficial debian repository?

2010-07-12 Thread Christoph Egger
"Desmond O. Chang" writes: > The team is inactive now. People's bugreports and patches don't get > any response. Many packages have been removed, many are out of date. > I think the slow and complicated uploading process is why the team > lacks contributors. > > Shall we need an unofficial repo

Bug#588094: marked as done (common-lisp-controller: Fails to purge because "cl-builder" user does not exist)

2010-07-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:40:25 +0100 with message-id <1278963625.8807.1960.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net> and subject line Re: Bug#588094: common-lisp-controller: Fails to purge because "cl-builder" user does not exist has caused the Debian Bug report #588094, regardin

Re: How does the Team work?

2010-07-12 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! Sorry that there was no response earlier. As you might have noticed there's not much going on on the mailing list right now. Faré writes: > I'd like cl-asdf 2.002 to be packaged as part of debian. I'm willing > to do the job, but I have no access rights. Is there anyone to sponsor > me t

Re: How does the Team work?

2010-07-12 Thread Faré
OK. So how do I start packaging, say, cl-asdf, cl-launch and common-lisp-controller, with a view on becoming DM? I have a .deb for cl-launch ready for upload, except that it depends on cl-asdf 2.000, which hasn't been packaged yet (or has it?). What should I do between debian's asdf.git and upstr