Bug#474483: xref in swank/slime bug

I cannot reproduce this bug anymore. Do you still have the problem with a recent slime and sbcl? Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson|

Bug#507302: not a bug I think...

The ` in bridge.el seems to use the new standard but to fire the warning: (setq bridge-last-failure `((funcall ',handler ',proc ,string) "Caused: " ,err not? Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.co

Processing of slime_20090409-1_amd64.changes

slime_20090409-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: slime_20090409-1.dsc slime_20090409.orig.tar.gz slime_20090409-1.diff.gz slime_20090409-1_all.deb cl-swank_20090409-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

slime_20090409-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cl-swank_20090409-1_all.deb to pool/main/s/slime/cl-swank_20090409-1_all.deb slime_20090409-1.diff.gz to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090409-1.diff.gz slime_20090409-1.dsc to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090409-1.dsc slime_20090409-1_all.deb to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090409-1_all.de

slime override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): cl-swank_20090409-1_all.deb: package says section is devel, override says lisp. slime_20090409-1_all.deb: package says section is devel, override says lisp. Please note that a list of new

Bug#457648: marked as done (cl-swank: cannot be loaded from SLIME on SBCL)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:02:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#457648: fixed in slime 1:20090409-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #457648, regarding cl-swank: cannot be loaded from SLIME on SBCL to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#478355: marked as done (emacs-package-install fails to install slime for xemacs21)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:02:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#478355: fixed in slime 1:20090409-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #478355, regarding emacs-package-install fails to install slime for xemacs21 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#410856: marked as done (cl-swank: incorrect LOOP in fuzzy-completion-set)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:02:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#410856: fixed in slime 1:20090409-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #410856, regarding cl-swank: incorrect LOOP in fuzzy-completion-set to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#477265: marked as done (cl-swank: typo in swank-loader.lisp creates spurious warnings)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:02:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#477265: fixed in slime 1:20090409-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #477265, regarding cl-swank: typo in swank-loader.lisp creates spurious warnings to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#517839: marked as done (slime: SLIME fails to upgrade)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:02:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#517839: fixed in slime 1:20090409-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #517839, regarding slime: SLIME fails to upgrade to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Bug#517205: marked as done (cl-swank: Possible DFSG violation in xref.lisp)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:02:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#517205: fixed in slime 1:20090409-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #517205, regarding cl-swank: Possible DFSG violation in xref.lisp to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been