Re: the list of packages to remove

2009-08-25 Thread Rupert Swarbrick
Peter Van Eynde writes: > > Well first of all there is bug-triage and handling. Everybody can change > the state of bugs in the bts. Hmm, yes, but "Please package a new version!" isn't a particularly helpful bug to get :) > Second I'll write up on how to update huchentoot for example to a new >

Re: the list of packages to remove

2009-08-25 Thread Peter Van Eynde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello Rupert, Rupert Swarbrick wrote: > I personally would be extremely happy if (revamped?) versions of the > following packages were in the archive. If I've got it right, these are > basically what's needed for hunchentoot to work. ... > As I ke

Re: the list of packages to remove

2009-08-25 Thread Rupert Swarbrick
I personally would be extremely happy if (revamped?) versions of the following packages were in the archive. If I've got it right, these are basically what's needed for hunchentoot to work. > Package: cl-cffi > Package: cl-chunga > Package: cl-trivial-gray-streams > Package: cl-flexi-streams > Pa

the list of packages to remove

2009-08-24 Thread Peter Van Eynde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello all, I've done some playing round with grep-available and I've come up with a list of packages that is 'owned' by kg-common-lisp-devel and that are not used by members outside the team: Package: cl-aima Package: cl-aserve Package: cl-cclan Pa