>>>>> "MZ" == Milan Zamazal writes:
MZ> The stumpwm package looks mostly unmaintained. I'd like to
MZ> help, is it OK to start working on it and its bugs and adding
MZ> myself to Uploaders?
No objections, so I updated the package to the curren
The stumpwm package looks mostly unmaintained. I'd like to help, is it
OK to start working on it and its bugs and adding myself to Uploaders?
___
pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list
pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:01:37 +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote:
> >> Or moving adduser to 'postinst configure'? Which one is right?
> > Oh yes, that sounds much better.
> > Unless the user is already needed earlier, but the .preinst seems to
> > only rm old stuff, AFAICS.
> I've uploaded 7.6 to mento
Hi gregor,
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 23:28, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 23:15:55 +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote:
>
>> > What surprises me is that common-lisp-controller _does_ depend on
>> > adduser. Do we need a Pre-Depends here since adduser is used in the
>> > .preinst?
>> Or mov
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 23:15:55 +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote:
> > What surprises me is that common-lisp-controller _does_ depend on
> > adduser. Do we need a Pre-Depends here since adduser is used in the
> > .preinst?
> Or moving adduser to 'postinst configure'? Which one is right?
Oh yes, that so
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 04:15, gregor herrmann wrote:
>
> What surprises me is that common-lisp-controller _does_ depend on
> adduser. Do we need a Pre-Depends here since adduser is used in the
> .preinst?
Or moving adduser to 'postinst configure'? Which one is right?
Thanks,
Des
___
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 606785 common-lisp-controller 7.4+nmu1
Bug #606785 [stumpwm] stumpwm: package fails to upgrade properly from lenny
Bug reassigned from package 'stumpwm' to 'common-lisp-controller'.
Bug No longer marked as foun
reassign 606785 common-lisp-controller 7.4+nmu1
thanks
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 18:48:45 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > SELECTING PREVIOUSLY DESELECTED PACKAGE COMMON-LISP-CONTROLLER.
>
> > DPKG: CONSIDERING DECONFIGURATION OF CLISP, WHICH WOULD BE BROKEN BY
> > INSTALLATION OF COMMON-LISP-CONTROL
