I don’t think the sbcl self-tests passed when I did my build, but I think I
pushed the right button and the deb build succeeded anyway. Overall, the build
succeeded and I was happy.
I picked version 1.2.1 because it was the most recent version that the SBCL
page marked as released for armhf. I
Christoph Egger writes:
> Christoph Egger writes:
>> I have a sbcl installed on my armhf board here (bootstrapping sbcl is
>> fortunately really fun!). Unfortunately sbcl 1.2.2 still fails the
>> testsuite -- once that's fixed I'll upload a sbcl binary for armhf into
>> the archive getting builds
Hi!
Austin Hendrix writes:
> I do packaging of ROS (Robot Operating System) for armhf, and over the
> past few years the lack of a packaged version of SBCL for armhf has
> been a bit of a pain. Until recently, I’ve worked around it because
> the upstream version of SBCL didn’t have armhf support,
Christoph Egger writes:
> I have a sbcl installed on my armhf board here (bootstrapping sbcl is
> fortunately really fun!). Unfortunately sbcl 1.2.2 still fails the
> testsuite -- once that's fixed I'll upload a sbcl binary for armhf into
> the archive getting builds started!
Ah wait, it's now bu
I do packaging of ROS (Robot Operating System) for armhf, and over the past few
years the lack of a packaged version of SBCL for armhf has been a bit of a
pain. Until recently, I’ve worked around it because the upstream version of
SBCL didn’t have armhf support, and working around the issue look
