Liam Healy wrote:
> Hi all-
>
> Thanks for your responses and all your work getting SBCL moving again.
> A check of http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/sbcl.html indicates that at
> the moment, SPARC is the only blocker, and this is evidently because
> of 453903, which is in a package I presume relate
Hi all-
Thanks for your responses and all your work getting SBCL moving again.
A check of http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/sbcl.html indicates that at
the moment, SPARC is the only blocker, and this is evidently because
of 453903, which is in a package I presume related to documentation
(dvipdf).
Peter Van Eynde wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> Luca Capello wrote:
> >> Given the bootstrap problem, we should IMHO rather get SBCL going
> >> again on those architectures than ask for removal of the 0.9.16
> >> binaries from lenny.
> >
> > Since manpower for the Debian Common Lisp Team is lacking (help
Hi all,
Luca Capello wrote:
>> Given the bootstrap problem, we should IMHO rather get SBCL going
>> again on those architectures than ask for removal of the 0.9.16
>> binaries from lenny.
>
> Since manpower for the Debian Common Lisp Team is lacking (help is
> always appreciated), I think that w
Hi Thiemo!
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 17:31:54 +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Liam Healy wrote:
>> and then several architectures on which there are no binaries (alpha,
>> mipsel, sparc), but that shouldn't block the other architectures,
>> should it?
>
> There _are_ binaries for these three in lenny, but
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
[snip]
> > and then several architectures on which there are no binaries (alpha,
> > mipsel, sparc), but that shouldn't block the other architectures,
> > should it?
>
> There _are_ binaries for these three in lenny, but not in sid, this
> blocks testing migration.
>
> Given
Liam Healy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With rumblings about lenny freezing for release in September, I took a
> look at what's in testing and found that SBCL is stuck at 0.9.16 for
> i386 and amd64 at least; according to
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/sbcl.html this appears to be from
> several causes.
>
Hi,
With rumblings about lenny freezing for release in September, I took a
look at what's in testing and found that SBCL is stuck at 0.9.16 for
i386 and amd64 at least; according to
http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/sbcl.html this appears to be from
several causes.
469015: I think this is really 46
