Re: new clisp packages

2017-07-01 Thread Bruno Haible
The new 2.49.60 release should probably fix a couple of bugs: * https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=385490 If clisp uses libffcall-1.13 and enables the FFI on all platforms, this should be fixed. * https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=478000 Try with --enable-port

Re: new clisp packages

2017-06-30 Thread Peter Van Eynde
Hello Bruno, > 1) It MUST be configured with --enable-portability. Ops. Didn’t do this, mea culpa. I’m uploading a fixed package now. > 2) Modules other than i18n, syscalls, regexp did not receive much attention > for some time and are not in the focus of version 2.50 either. That's >

Re: new clisp packages

2017-06-30 Thread Norbert Preining
Good morning, > I’m pushing a new libsigsegv an clisp out now, using the ‘old’ git standard > which I use: an upstream branch and a debian branch which gets rebased on > every new upstream release. Thanks, great, arrived in the repo. Norbert -- PREINING Norbert h

Re: new clisp packages

2017-06-30 Thread Bruno Haible
Two things about the clisp 2.49.60 release: 1) It MUST be configured with --enable-portability. Without it, currently there are no guarantees that it will build and run without crashes, on any platform. This option disables a number of optimizations, but has shown good succes

Re: new clisp packages

2017-06-30 Thread pvaneynd
Hello Norbert, >> Christoph hasn’t replied yet, so I’m going forward on packaging the new >> clisp/libsigsegv. Real life however means that I probably can send out an >> update and then go offline for a month or so. > > If you let me join I can do some work, too. There is 2.49.60 out. > So in c

Re: new clisp packages

2017-06-30 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Peter, > Christoph hasn’t replied yet, so I’m going forward on packaging the new > clisp/libsigsegv. Real life however means that I probably can send out an > update and then go offline for a month or so. If you let me join I can do some work, too. There is 2.49.60 out. So in case you are of

Re: new clisp packages

2017-06-30 Thread pvaneynd
Hello Norbert, Christoph hasn’t replied yet, so I’m going forward on packaging the new clisp/libsigsegv. Real life however means that I probably can send out an update and then go offline for a month or so. Best regards, Peter smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature _

Re: new clisp packages

2017-06-29 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Peter, > Oh great! I know that the clisp people are working hard on releasing a new > version ‘soon’ so I’ll start making snapshot packages, I’ll of course try to > integrate your work too. Any progress here? Since clisp is out of testing, we can upload even testing versions I guess, and see

Re: new clisp packages

2017-06-20 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi I tried working from the git repository and preparing a pull request, but sorry to say, the git is a huge mess :-( (missing tags, wild mixture of branches, various upstream etc) at least I didn't find a documentation what is where ;-) If you want me to put something in a git repo for you to

Re: new clisp packages

2017-06-20 Thread pvaneynd
Hi Christoph, Replying sans Norbert. I tried updating libsigsegv and clisp to newer versions but I noticed that the git repository layout is different now and doesn’t seem to follow https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianCommonLisp/GitPackaging anymore. I notice that there are upstreams in the g

Re: new clisp packages

2017-06-20 Thread pvaneynd
Hello Norbert, > I have taken the liberty to prepare a package, as reference, of > the latest 2.49.51 version: Oh great! I know that the clisp people are working hard on releasing a new version ‘soon’ so I’ll start making snapshot packages, I’ll of course try to integrate your work too. Thanks