Re: Proposed new requirements for emacsen add-on packages

2014-01-25 Thread Agustin Martin
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 12:39:27PM -0600, Rob Browning wrote: > Agustin Martin writes: > > > Did not test in depth, but I think the add-on state files state files > > could be recreated from /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install in > > case emacsen-common is installed for the first time (i.e.,

Re: Proposed new requirements for emacsen add-on packages

2014-01-25 Thread Rob Browning
Agustin Martin writes: > I may be wrong, but if add-on-depending-on-add-on-1 depends on add-on-1 dpkg > should care of configuring add-on-1 first. However, there is no warranty > about unpack ordering. No, of course -- I think you're right, and I believe that was part of my reasoning when workin

Re: Proposed new requirements for emacsen add-on packages

2014-01-23 Thread Rob Browning
[Apologies for any duplication: resending because the previous cc list had been truncated.] Modestas Vainius writes: > I suggest that you bump policy version to 3 since current policy is probably > going to be nothing like v2. We could, though I hadn't been planning on it since these changes

Re: Proposed new requirements for emacsen add-on packages

2014-01-23 Thread Rob Browning
Rob Browning writes: > However, to demonstrate why I'm beginning to think the current approach > may be unworkable, consider the case where no emacsen-related packages > are installed and someone runs this: > > apt-get install emacs24 add-on-depending-on-add-on-1 add-on-1 > > What should happen

Re: Proposed new requirements for emacsen add-on packages

2014-01-23 Thread Rob Browning
Agustin Martin writes: > Did not test in depth, but I think the add-on state files state files > could be recreated from /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install in > case emacsen-common is installed for the first time (i.e., not > upgraded). Since emacs flavours depend on emacsen-common they sho

Re: Proposed new requirements for emacsen add-on packages

2014-01-22 Thread Stephane Crivisier
-- Stephane Crivisier On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Rob Browning wrote: > Recently I've been fixing some non-trivial problems I introduced in > emacsen-common 2.0.0 -- and to finish fixing them it looks like it may > be best to change (and augment) some of the add-on package requirements. >

Re: Proposed new requirements for emacsen add-on packages

2014-01-22 Thread 韓達耐
Hi Rob It looks like your proposal is the best way forward, so I am in favour of adding this dependency in all the Emacs-dependent packages. BR -- Danai On 20 January 2014 14:20, Stephane Crivisier wrote: > -- > Stephane Crivisier > > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Rob Browning wrote:

Re: Proposed new requirements for emacsen add-on packages

2014-01-22 Thread Agustin Martin
2014/1/20 Rob Browning : > > Recently I've been fixing some non-trivial problems I introduced in > emacsen-common 2.0.0 -- and to finish fixing them it looks like it may > be best to change (and augment) some of the add-on package requirements. > > Originally, I'd really tried to make it so that as