On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 06:29:03PM +0100, Kambiz Darabi wrote:
> sorry for bothering you again but there are people who are interested in
> a new debian package of ASDF 3.1.6
You didn't file a RFS.
Me and other "random sponors you find in -mentors" checks
https://bugs.debian.org/sponsorship-reques
Hi Mattia,
On 2015-12-28 18:56 CET, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 06:29:03PM +0100, Kambiz Darabi wrote:
>> sorry for bothering you again but there are people who are interested in
>> a new debian package of ASDF 3.1.6
>
> You didn't file a RFS.
> Me and other "random sponors y
Hi all,
sorry for bothering you again but there are people who are interested in
a new debian package of ASDF 3.1.6 and I would like to at least have
some feedback on its packaging.
Can some kind soul please upload the package if it is acceptable or let
me know what to change?
Thank you
Kambiz
Dear Common Lisp team,
dear mentors,
as it's my first time, I wonder whether I have made a mistake while
uploading the new version:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/cl-asdf
Should I change something?
Thank you
Kambiz
On 2015-11-23 21:43 CET, Kambiz Darabi wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I have
Dear Common Lisp team,
dear mentors,
as it's my first time, I wonder whether I have made a mistake while
uploading the new version:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/cl-asdf
Should I change something?
Thank you
Kambiz
On 2015-11-23 21:43 CET, Kambiz Darabi wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I have
Dear mentors,
I have taken over the debian packaging for ASDF from Faré and am looking
for sponsors for the current 3.1.6 release.
Please upload the cl-asdf package, after checking that it works for
you.
The cl-asdf source package builds this binary package:
cl-asdf- Another System Definiti
Faré writes:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Christoph Egger
> wrote:
>> Christoph Egger writes:
>>> There seems to be a somewhat large diff between the "upstream" release
>>> and the debian package source? Is this on purpose?
>>
>> Then the debian package seems to be (almost) the same as the
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Christoph Egger
wrote:
> Christoph Egger writes:
>> There seems to be a somewhat large diff between the "upstream" release
>> and the debian package source? Is this on purpose?
>
> Then the debian package seems to be (almost) the same as the git archive
> but quit
Hi!
Faré writes:
> It has many bug fixes, most importantly with debian Bug#787909,
> an incompatibility of 3.1.4 with the latest SBCL.
>
> Please upload the cl-asdf package, after checking that
> it works fine for you.
>
> The cl-asdf source package builds this binary package:
> cl-asdf- Anot
Hi!
Christoph Egger writes:
> There seems to be a somewhat large diff between the "upstream" release
> and the debian package source? Is this on purpose?
Then the debian package seems to be (almost) the same as the git archive
but quite different from the tarball
Christoph
--
9FED 5C6C E206
Dear Common-Lisp-inclined Debian mentors,
I have uploaded to mentors a debian package for cl-asdf 3.1.5.
I'm hoping that in the future, someone else could take over
the debian packaging for asdf, but we'll see.
(Kambiz, are you still interested?)
It has many bug fixes, most importantly with debia
Milan Zamazal wrote:
> Done. The package didn't build, so I had to add a small patch —
> apparently the last line in Makefile should start with a tab instead of
> spaces.
>
Thanks. We caught that later, but only after the release :-/
Standard tab-avoidance behavior not good on makefiles...
che
Done. The package didn't build, so I had to add a small patch —
apparently the last line in Makefile should start with a tab instead of
spaces.
___
pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list
pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.deb
Dear Common-Lisp-inclined Debian mentors,
I have uploaded to mentors a debian package for cl-asdf 3.1.4.
I'm hoping that in the future, someone else could take over
the debian packaging for asdf, but we'll see.
(Kambiz, are you still interested?)
It's mostly a bug fix release as compared to 3.1.3
Dear mentors,
I have uploaded to mentors a debian package for cl-asdf 3.1.3. I'm
hoping that in the future, someone else could take over the debian
packaging for asdf, but we'll see. (Kambiz, are you still interested?)
It's a bug fix release as compared to 3.1.2, with some bugs that would
have bl
> I have read a lot, checked the Makefile and your minimakefile branch.
> I still don't feel self-confident enough to say "I know how to do it"
>
The minimakefile branch is where the action is, and you need to update
it, with e.g.
git pull --rebase
> Following the comment in release:
>
>> (defu
Dear mentors,
never say never. Here I am packaging cl-asdf for debian once more.
One last time, I hope (I don't use debian much anymore, I moved to NixOS,
and I'm trying to wean off ASDF, too).
Robert Goldman can't take over after all, but maybe Kambiz Darabi can.
Please upload the cl-asdf packag
Just a couple of notes:
- Please check the package with (current) lintian and fix the reported
errors. It complains about too long changelog line 6 and about
slightly outdated Standards version.
- Could you please update the download location in debian/copyright?
After you upload the fixed
> "RG" == Robert Goldman writes:
RG> Please upload the cl-asdf package, after checking that it works
RG> fine for you.
I'll try to do it soon.
___
pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list
pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lis
Dear mentors,
I have taken over the debian packaging for ASDF from Fare. We have just
released version 3.1.2, and I have put the package up using dput. Note
that I am a novice at this, so it's quite likely I have gotten something
wrong.
This brand new ASDF release has received a lot of testing,
Hi Faré
Faré writes:
> I'm still doing the debian packaging for ASDF at this point in time
> for the new upstream maintainer Robert Goldman.
>
> This brand new ASDF release received a lot of testing, and
> fixes a shameful bug in previous recent releases
> that affects usability under debian (#72
Dear mentors,
I'm still doing the debian packaging for ASDF at this point in time
for the new upstream maintainer Robert Goldman.
This brand new ASDF release received a lot of testing, and
fixes a shameful bug in previous recent releases
that affects usability under debian (#723977).
Can one of
> "F" == Faré writes:
F> - dget
F>
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-asdf/cl-asdf_3.0.2.4-1.dsc
F> I would be glad if someone uploaded these packages for me.
Done.
___
pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list
pkg-common-lisp
Dear mentors,
OK, Robert Goldman, the new ASDF maintainer, can't do the debian
release at this time, so until someone picks up the slack, I'll keep
doing it, at least from time to time.
Can one of the active CL debian hackers please upload the cl-asdf
package, after checking that it works fine fo
Hi!
Faré writes:
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Robert Goldman wrote:
> - dget
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-asdf/cl-asdf_3.0.2-1.dsc
Upstream tarbal is
6f78cb311f9b8756ebed5924a6bd7302e283ccbf
The dsc mentions
7987d33bafe5a1f0fa91a7380a3594206a5a0cdb
Is this intenti
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Robert Goldman wrote:
> Faré passed on to me the maintenance chores for cl-asdf, and together we
> submitted the latest release to the mentors web site.
>
> Please contact Faré and me for more information.
>
> Best,
> Robert Goldman
>
Dear mentors,
Robert Goldman
26 matches
Mail list logo
