On 24 August 2010 18:09, Desmond O. Chang wrote:
> I'm not sure the release date so I upload 7.4 first. Once you puts a
> new cl-asdf into squeeze, I'll follow.
>
OK, so I released 2.006, which fixes a few bugs and will make CLISP happier.
Uploaded to mentors.
Milan (or another DD), can you che
Hi!
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 02:24, Faré wrote:
> Actually, there are a few bug fixes upstream, and if there's a cut off
> date before which to issue 2.006 so it may be part of the next stable,
> I can advance the release of it (which otherwise would be
> mid-september).
I'm not sure the release
Actually, there are a few bug fixes upstream, and if there's a cut off
date before which to issue 2.006 so it may be part of the next stable,
I can advance the release of it (which otherwise would be
mid-september).
[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ]
If
Hi!
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 07:04, Faré wrote:
> Note that if you upgrade c-l-c, you'll probably want a matching recent
> asdf (2.005 is best), and a cl-launch that works with it (3.001).
> Recent c-l-c will NOT work with an older asdf, and older cl-launch
> will not work with newer asdf. They ar
Note that if you upgrade c-l-c, you'll probably want a matching recent
asdf (2.005 is best), and a cl-launch that works with it (3.001).
Recent c-l-c will NOT work with an older asdf, and older cl-launch
will not work with newer asdf. They are very small self-contained
programs without anyone else
Hi!
"Desmond O. Chang" writes:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 00:57, Christoph Egger wrote:
>> I guess this is targeted at squeeze? Have you contacted the release
>> team already? If not please mail them and explain why you should get a
>> freeze exception (looks like that should not be a problem
Hi Christoph!
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 00:57, Christoph Egger wrote:
>
> I guess this is targeted at squeeze? Have you contacted the release
> team already? If not please mail them and explain why you should get a
> freeze exception (looks like that should not be a problem to me). If you
> have
Hi!
"Desmond O. Chang" writes:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 7.4
> of my package "common-lisp-controller".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> common-lisp-controller - Common Lisp source and compiler manager
>
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
>
> The upload would f
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 7.4
of my package "common-lisp-controller".
It builds these binary packages:
common-lisp-controller - Common Lisp source and compiler manager
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 593157
The packag
"Desmond O. Chang" writes:
> PO files are updated by debconf-updatepo when I call `fakeroot
> debian/rules clean'. It just inserts a 'Language' tag [1] into PO
> files.
OK then. uploaded.
I'm having some exames this and next week so don't expect any fast
response times for any of the other mail
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 05:08, Christoph Egger wrote:
> "Desmond O. Chang" writes:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 7.3
>> of my package "common-lisp-controller".
>>
>> It builds these binary packages:
>> common-lisp-controller - Common Lisp source and compiler manager
>>
>>
"Desmond O. Chang" writes:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 7.3
> of my package "common-lisp-controller".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> common-lisp-controller - Common Lisp source and compiler manager
>
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
>
> The upload would fix th
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 7.3
of my package "common-lisp-controller".
It builds these binary packages:
common-lisp-controller - Common Lisp source and compiler manager
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 589185
The packag
13 matches
Mail list logo
