FYI: The status of the ecl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 16.1.2-2
Current version: 16.1.2-3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will re
Your message dated Sat, 2 Sep 2017 17:50:50 +0100
with message-id <0a6efc92-10fe-3e77-5524-270cf3928...@debian.org>
and subject line ecl-doc is no longer built
has caused the Debian Bug report #671752,
regarding ecl-doc: Contains no documentation
to be marked as done.
This means that you
ecl 16.1.2-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2017-10-07
It is affected by these RC bugs:
873091: ecl: missing dependency on libffi-dev
___
pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list
pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
FYI: The status of the ecl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 15.3.7+dfsg1-2
Current version: 16.1.2-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2017 23:05:10 +0300
with message-id <20170612200509.b4jpacqqrkbymnon@localhost>
and subject line Closing obsolete autotools/autoreconf requests
has caused the Debian Bug report #727368,
regarding ecl: run dh-autoreconf to update config.{sub,guess} and
{l
Your message dated Mon, 12 Jun 2017 23:05:10 +0300
with message-id <20170612200509.b4jpacqqrkbymnon@localhost>
and subject line Closing obsolete autotools/autoreconf requests
has caused the Debian Bug report #727368,
regarding ecl: run dh-autoreconf to update config.{sub,guess} and
{l
FYI: The status of the ecl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 15.3.7+dfsg1-1
Current version: 15.3.7+dfsg1-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a da
Your message dated Mon, 10 Oct 2016 16:58:56 +0100
with message-id <5caf5666-30ff-865c-7a08-3928ada97...@debian.org>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #732020,
regarding ecl: FTBFS on powerpcspe
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
FYI: The status of the ecl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 13.5.1+dfsg2-4.2
Current version: 15.3.7+dfsg1-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a da
Your message dated Sun, 03 May 2015 15:51:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#769309: fixed in ecl 15.3.7+dfsg1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #769309,
regarding ecl: This version does not compile backend.lisp file of cl-swank
package with Emacs24 in amd64.
to be marked as done
Your message dated Sun, 03 May 2015 15:51:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#714244: fixed in ecl 15.3.7+dfsg1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #714244,
regarding ecl: New upstream release (13.5.1)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Sun, 03 May 2015 15:51:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#719177: fixed in ecl 15.3.7+dfsg1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #719177,
regarding ecl: Build with unicode enabled
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit source ecl
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'ecl'
Limit currently set to 'source':'ecl'
> tags 714244 + pending
Bug #714244 [ecl] ecl: New upstream releas
Package: ecl
Version: 13.5.1+dfsg2-4.2
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
Calling slime from Emacs 24 is given a compilation error due to innapropriate
library path include when calling gcc to generate backend.fas from
backend.lisp. The calling function where:
(RUN-PROGRAM &quo
FYI: The status of the ecl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 13.5.1+dfsg2-4.2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times
Your message dated Sat, 13 Sep 2014 09:19:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#613484: fixed in ecl 13.5.1+dfsg2-4.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #613484,
regarding /usr/bin/ecl is not installed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #613484 [ecl] /usr/bin/ecl is not installed
Added tag(s) patch.
--
613484: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613484
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with probl
Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi,
the problem is a faulty postrm script that removes /usr/bin/ecl on
upgrade after the new files are unpacked, see [1]. A workaround is to
remove ecl and then install it again. The attached patch fixes the
postrm script but since the old postrm script is run on upgrade
tags 724364 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for ecl (versioned as 13.5.1+dfsg2-4.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
Eric Dorland
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com
diff -Nru ecl-13.5.1+
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 724364 + pending
Bug #724364 [src:ecl] Please stop build depending on automake1.4, automake1.9
and automake1.10
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
724364: http://bugs.debia
FYI: The status of the ecl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 13.5.1+dfsg2-4
Current version: (not in testing)
Hint: <http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals>
Bug #613484: /usr/bin/ecl is not installed
The script tha
Package: ecl
Version: 13.5.1+dfsg2-4
Followup-For: Bug #613484
This is still an issue:
$ apt-get install --reinstall ecl
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded.
Need to
FYI: The status of the ecl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 13.5.1+dfsg2-4
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a da
Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2013 17:33:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#727368: fixed in ecl 13.5.1+dfsg2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #727368,
regarding ecl: update config.{sub,guess} for the AArch64 port
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #ecl (13.5.1+dfsg2-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
> #
> # * Update config.* during build (Closes: #727368)
> #
> limit source ecl
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'ecl'
Limit curr
Package: ecl
Version: 13.5.1+dfsg1-1
Followup-For: Bug #727368
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu trusty ubuntu-patch
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* Use autotools-dev to update config.{sub,guess} for new arches
FYI: The status of the ecl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 11.1.1+dfsg1-2
Current version: (not in testing)
Hint: <http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals>
The script that generates this mail tries to extract remo
Source: ecl
Version: 12.12.1-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: debian-powerpc...@breakpoint.cc
Usertags: powerpcspe
Hi,
ecl currently FTBFS on powerpcspe like this:
[...]
libtool: compile: gcc -fPIC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/«PKGBUILDDIR»/src/libffi
-I. -I/«PKGBUILDDIR»/src/libffi/include
instead, and use the tools provided
> by autotools-dev to update these files.
A new ecl is high on my priority list and I'm about to clean up a lot of
stuff in the process which will include automatic config.*
updates. However this will not happen for at least another 2 weeks. So
if you
ource: warning: failed to verify signature on ./ecl_12.12.1-3ubuntu1.dsc
dpkg-source: info: extracting ecl in ecl-12.12.1
dpkg-source: info: unpacking ecl_12.12.1.orig.tar.gz
dpkg-source: info: unpacking ecl_12.12.1-3ubuntu1.debian.tar.gz
dpkg-source: info: applying autoconf-file-update.patch
dpkg-source:
Your message dated Tue, 17 Sep 2013 20:00:22 +0800
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#723292: ecl link with -L/usr/lib
has caused the Debian Bug report #723292,
regarding ecl link with -L/usr/lib
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Sorry for this mistake bug report
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 6:32 PM, YunQiang Su wrote:
> Package: ecl
> Version: 12.12.1-3
> X-Debbugs-CC: wzss...@gmail.com
>
> This package has one or more -L/usr/lib in its build system,
> which will make it ftbfs if there is libraries under /u
Package: ecl
Version: 12.12.1-3
X-Debbugs-CC: wzss...@gmail.com
This package has one or more -L/usr/lib in its build system,
which will make it ftbfs if there is libraries under /usr/lib,
while is not the default architecture, mips* for example.
On mips* systems, /usr/lib is defined as place to
Package: ecl
Version: 12.12.1-3
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu saucy
Please add --enable-unicode to ecl's configure flags. Ubuntu has done
this for 5 years.
Originally reported at https://launchpad.net/bugs/123530
Thanks,
Jeremy
- -- System Information:
D
Hello,
This message is addressed to all maintainers of a package that
build-depends on gmp.
Yesterday's upload (gmp version 5.1.2+dfsg-2) changed the location of
gmp.h from /usr/include to /usr/include/$(multi-arch-triplet). This
was done to fix bug #675577. This change *should* be invisible, s
Package: ecl
Version: 12.12.1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
building package from source fails already at phase "configure":
edi@host:~/ecl-12.12.1$ dpkg-buildpackage
checking for int8_t... yes
checking for uint8_t... yes
checking for int16_t... yes
checking for uint16_t... ye
Hi,
We found a crash in rt.fas contained in the ecl package. You are being
contacted because your are listed as one of the maintainer of ecl.
We are planning to submit the bug to the Debian bug tracking system in two
weeks. We wanted to give you a heads-up, so that you some time to assess the
Hi,
We found a crash in bytecmp.fas contained in the ecl package. You are being
contacted because your are listed as one of the maintainer of ecl.
We are planning to submit the bug to the Debian bug tracking system in two
weeks. We wanted to give you a heads-up, so that you some time to assess
Hi,
We found a crash in cmp.fas contained in the ecl package. You are being
contacted because your are listed as one of the maintainer of ecl.
We are planning to submit the bug to the Debian bug tracking system in two
weeks. We wanted to give you a heads-up, so that you some time to assess the
Hi,
We found a crash in profile.fas contained in the ecl package. You are being
contacted because your are listed as one of the maintainer of ecl.
We are planning to submit the bug to the Debian bug tracking system in two
weeks. We wanted to give you a heads-up, so that you some time to assess
Hi,
We found a crash in defsystem.fas contained in the ecl package. You are being
contacted because your are listed as one of the maintainer of ecl.
We are planning to submit the bug to the Debian bug tracking system in two
weeks. We wanted to give you a heads-up, so that you some time to assess
Package: ecl
Version: 11.1.1+dfsg1-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
new upstream release of ECL is available at version 13.5.1
This version is known to work for building OpenAxiom.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.1
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (990, 'stable')
Ar
Package: ecl
Version: 12.12.1-2
The following triggers a segfault:
$ echo "syntax error" | ecl 2>/dev/full
this crash is supposed to be fixed by the patch write_error.patch from
the sage package which I forwarded some days ago in a personal mail.
Hélas, I tried to roll my own ec
FYI: The status of the ecl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 11.1.1-4
Current version: 11.1.1+dfsg1-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2013 19:17:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#696757: fixed in ecl 11.1.1+dfsg1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #696757,
regarding ecl: FTBFS: hang in sigsuspend
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Would it be an option to configure ecl with --enable-threads=no on
> kfreebsd-* and hurd-* for wheezy? Would any functionality be lost or
> would it only affect performance? The version in squeeze didn't have
> threads enabled, and there don
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #696757 [src:ecl] ecl: FTBFS: hang in sigsuspend
Added tag(s) patch.
--
696757: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696757
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with probl
Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi Christoph,
Would it be an option to configure ecl with --enable-threads=no on
kfreebsd-* and hurd-* for wheezy? Would any functionality be lost or
would it only affect performance? The version in squeeze didn't have
threads enabled, and there don't seem
nal.h says only 32,33 are reserved). ecl seems to use
SIGRTMIN+2 internally which should not be a problem. I failed to see so
far what signals are used by libgc on linux
glibc uses 32 and 33 normally and 34 for debuging of pthread library.
libgc have to use separate signals, 32+{5,6} satisfies
Are these signals fine for
> kfreebsd glibc (signal.h says only 32,33 are reserved). ecl seems to use
> SIGRTMIN+2 internally which should not be a problem. I failed to see so
> far what signals are used by libgc on linux
http://people.debian.org/~christoph/ecl_min.ktrace.txt
Unfortunaty
glibc (signal.h says only 32,33 are reserved). ecl seems to use
SIGRTMIN+2 internally which should not be a problem. I failed to see so
far what signals are used by libgc on linux
Christoph
___
pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list
pkg-common-lisp-
Hi!
As 12.12.1 in experimental builds while the unstable/testing one
doesn't I've bisected down the changes in upstream git. It seems to work
since c7953cc0f54281c3de6a845f3599544afba20b2a. The patch doesn't simply
apply to unstable so I haven't tested jet if that'd simply work. Also
it's a bit
Hi all!
I guess ecl has never ever worked with libgc and enabled threads on
kfreebsd (seems to be a header-only thing and libgc added thread support
for kfreebsd *after* the last successfull ecl build).
It still seems to be waiting in GC_stop_world() for all other processes
to finish and
.org/software/gdb/bugs/>...
Reading symbols from /home/christoph/debian/ecl-stable/build/ecl_min...done.
Breakpoint 1 at 0x4508f4: file
/home/christoph/debian/ecl-stable/src/c/numbers/cos.d, line 28.
Breakpoint 2 at 0x43f7c0: file /home/christoph/debian/ecl-stable/src/c/error.d,
line 526.
Breakpoint 3
My current guess is that ecl seems to block some signals it shouldn't
be able to. However I'm somehow no longer able to run ecl_min in gdb in
a usefull way it seems
___
pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list
pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.
Processing control commands:
> found -1 11.1.1-4
Bug #696757 [src:ecl] ecl: FTBFS: hang in sigsuspend
Marked as found in versions ecl/11.1.1-4.
> fixed -1 12.12.1-1
Bug #696757 [src:ecl] ecl: FTBFS: hang in sigsuspend
Marked as fixed in versions ecl/12.12.1-1.
--
696757: http://bugs.debi
Control: found -1 11.1.1-4
Control: fixed -1 12.12.1-1
Hi,
I tried to build ecl 11.1.1-4 in a kfreebsd-i386 wheezy machine (on kvm) and
it hangs the same way, so this bug is also present in wheezy.
It seems to be fixed in experimental.
Cheers,
Ivo
..@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: kfreebsd
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
>
> Hi!
>
> ECL build hangs early in ecl_min compile. It can be made going further
> by pressing C-c repeated
Package: src:ecl
Version: 11.1.1+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid wheezy
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi!
ECL build hangs early in ecl_min compile
Your message dated Wed, 26 Dec 2012 08:47:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#695718: fixed in ecl 11.1.1+dfsg1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #695718,
regarding ecl: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Hi!
A fix for unstable is currently building. Hopefully it's still
building everywhere ecl tends to be a bit nasty there ;-)
Regards
Christoph
___
pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list
pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
Source: ecl
Version: 11.1.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Usertags: gfdl
src/gmp/doc/gmp.texi contains the GNU MP library documentation, with the
following license:
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free
Your message dated Tue, 09 Oct 2012 20:43:44 +0200
with message-id <87a9vvwknz.fsf...@brouzouf.villemot.name>
and subject line Re: Bug#665747: /usr/bin/ecl missing in 11.1.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #665747,
regarding testing's /usr/bin/ecl removed from stables maintscript dur
At bug #547929[1], there's a request for some actual documentation in
the ecl-doc package. Hunting around, I realised that ECL moved to a new
manual at some point, which no longer lives in the upstream "ecl"
tarballs. You can read the new manual at [2] or there's a git reposi
t; only reference related to c-l-c removal in ecl package is
> debian/postrm, which has been already removed in the unstable version
> for some time.
It seems this bug is fixed in unstable, so changing found and fixed versions.
Cheers,
Ivo
___
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 665747 11.1.1-4
Bug #665747 [ecl] testing's /usr/bin/ecl removed from stables maintscript
during upgrade
No longer marked as found in versions ecl/11.1.1-4.
> fixed 665747 11.1.1-4
Bug #665747 [ecl] testing's /usr/bin/
Package: ecl-doc
Version: 11.1.1-4
Severity: normal
The ecl-doc package contains none of the ECL documentation. Previous
versions used to contain two info docs. Perhaps the HTML manual could
be packaged up for inclusion in this package?
<http://ecls.sourceforge.net/new-manual/>
--
Robert Millan writes:
> El 15 d’abril de 2012 16:09, Christoph Egger >>> ;;; About to load
> lsp/load.lsp
>>>> E: Caught signal 'Terminated': terminating immediately
>>>> make[2]: *** [bin/ecl] Terminated
>>>> make[1]: ***
El 15 d’abril de 2012 16:09, Christoph Egger >>> ;;; About to load lsp/load.lsp
>>> E: Caught signal 'Terminated': terminating immediately
>>> make[2]: *** [bin/ecl] Terminated
>>> make[1]: *** [all] Terminated
>>> make: *** [build-arch-stamp]
gt; else \
>> gcc -o ecl_min cinit.o c/all_symbols.o -L./ libeclmin.a
>> -latomic_ops -leclffi -lgmp -lgc -lpthread -ldl -lm ;\
>> fi
>> sed -e 's,@ecldir\\@,/usr/lib/ecl-12.2.1/,g' \
>> -e 's,@libdir\\@,/usr/lib/,g'
_symbols.o -L./ libeclmin.a
> -latomic_ops -leclffi -lgmp -lgc -lpthread -ldl -lm ;\
> fi
> sed -e 's,@ecldir\\@,/usr/lib/ecl-12.2.1/,g' \
> -e 's,@libdir\\@,/usr/lib/,g' < compile.pre > compile.lsp
> echo "#" `uname -a` > build-sta
failed to build on the kfreebsd-* buildds:
if [ -f CROSS-COMPILER ]; then \
touch ecl_min; \
else \
gcc -o ecl_min cinit.o c/all_symbols.o -L./ libeclmin.a
-latomic_ops -leclffi -lgmp -lgc -lpthread -ldl -lm ;\
fi
sed -e 's,@ecldir\\@,/usr/li
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:17:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#648993: fixed in ecl 12.2.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #648993,
regarding ecl: FTBFS on hurd-i386
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Mon, 26 Mar 2012 18:32:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#613484: fixed in ecl 9.6.1-1squeeze2
has caused the Debian Bug report #613484,
regarding /usr/bin/ecl is not installed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 01:03, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Aron Xu writes:
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 00:34, Christoph Egger wrote:
>>> clone 613484 -1
>>> found -1 11.1.1-4
>>> tags -1 - pending
>>> retitle -1 testing's /usr/bin/ecl removed fro
Christoph Egger writes:
> Aron Xu writes:
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 00:34, Christoph Egger wrote:
>>> clone 613484 -1
>>> found -1 11.1.1-4
>>> tags -1 - pending
>>> retitle -1 testing's /usr/bin/ecl removed from stables maintscript dur
Aron Xu writes:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 00:34, Christoph Egger wrote:
>> clone 613484 -1
>> found -1 11.1.1-4
>> tags -1 - pending
>> retitle -1 testing's /usr/bin/ecl removed from stables maintscript during
>> upgrade
>> stop
>>
>>>
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 00:34, Christoph Egger wrote:
> clone 613484 -1
> found -1 11.1.1-4
> tags -1 - pending
> retitle -1 testing's /usr/bin/ecl removed from stables maintscript during
> upgrade
> stop
>
>> Should I file a separate bug, clone this bug or
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 613484 -1
Bug #613484 [ecl] /usr/bin/ecl is not installed
Bug 613484 cloned as bug 665747
> found -1 11.1.1-4
Bug #665747 [ecl] /usr/bin/ecl is not installed
Marked as found in versions ecl/11.1.1-4.
> tags -1 - pending
Bug #66
clone 613484 -1
found -1 11.1.1-4
tags -1 - pending
retitle -1 testing's /usr/bin/ecl removed from stables maintscript during
upgrade
stop
> Should I file a separate bug, clone this bug or something else?
Cloning away.
--
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731
Debian D
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012, Christoph Egger wrote:
I *think* this is a different bug due to removal of
common-lisp-controler and maintainer scripts not coping with it. A
`aptitude reinstall ecl` should solve it for you.
It does.
Just to make sure: Did you have any older ecl installed on that
Hi!
Faheem Mitha writes:
> I just installed 11.1.1-4 on unstable, and /usr/bin/ecl is missing,
> though dpkg thinks it is there. Should I reopen this bug or create a
> new bug?
>
>Regards, Faheem
>
> orwell:/hom
I just installed 11.1.1-4 on unstable, and /usr/bin/ecl is missing, though
dpkg thinks it is there. Should I reopen this bug or create a new bug?
Regards, Faheem
orwell:/home/faheem# dpkg -l ecl
||/ Name
Alle domenica 5 febbraio 2012, Samuel Thibault ha scritto:
> Pino Toscano, le Sun 05 Feb 2012 12:56:39 +0100, a écrit :
> > note I don't think it should be forwarded upstream, as it is not
> > clean and kind of working around the lack of realtime signals in
> > Hurd.
Pino Toscano, le Sun 05 Feb 2012 12:56:39 +0100, a écrit :
> note I don't think it should be forwarded upstream, as it is not clean
> and kind of working around the lack of realtime signals in Hurd.
Well, given that ecl explicitly uses libgc, which explicitly uses
SIGUSR1, it sounds re
Hi,
Alle mercoledì 16 novembre 2011, Svante Signell ha scritto:
> The attached patch fixes the FTBFS problems of ecl on GNU/Hurd. When
> native threads are enabled the "./ecl_min compile" command hangs.
Preface: libgc, used by ecl, makes use of the SIGUSR1 & SIGUSR2 signal
Your message dated Sat, 4 Feb 2012 01:55:58 +0800
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug #580779: cl-asdf: ecl won't install: The function
SYSTEM-SOURCE-FILE is undefined
has caused the Debian Bug report #580779,
regarding cl-asdf: ecl won't install: The function SYSTEM-SOUR
Package: ecl
Version: 11.1.1-4
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
Hi,
The attached patch fixes the FTBFS problems of ecl on GNU/Hurd. When
native threads are enabled the "./ecl_min compile" command hangs.
Thanks!
diff -ur ecl-11.1.1/de
FYI: The status of the ecl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 9.6.1-1squeeze1
Current version: 11.1.1-4
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2011 21:47:56 +0100
with message-id <877hbtv7r7@hepworth.siccegge.de>
and subject line fixed!
has caused the Debian Bug report #599967,
regarding ecl: FTBFS on ia64: Lisp initialization error. / Bad address
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
hat would be the head
>> commit on the experimental branch.
>
> That would be interesting to test. Often I do need to use the build
> machines to test stuff like this. Did you try this on an ia64 machine?
> Does the resulting binary work?
It builds on merulo -- the ia64 porterbox
this works nicely and should survive new upstream versions
better. Also we can label the patches with DEP3 so it becomes clear why
we have this patch and if we forwarded it upstream.
I will integrate your changes to ECL in my new branch and then I will
start working on sbcl. But first I need to rebui
Hi!
Peter Van Eynde writes:
> On 03/03/11 16:53, Christoph Egger wrote:
>> I've been struggling a bit with ecl but going forward with getting a
>> 11.1.1 to work. Just now I noticed some activity by Peter -- are you
>> also working on it? Just to avoid doing stu
[resend due to bogus reject]
Hello Christoph,
On 03/03/11 16:53, Christoph Egger wrote:
> I've been struggling a bit with ecl but going forward with getting a
> 11.1.1 to work. Just now I noticed some activity by Peter -- are you
> also working on it? Just to avoid doing stuff
Hi!
I've been struggling a bit with ecl but going forward with getting a
11.1.1 to work. Just now I noticed some activity by Peter -- are you
also working on it? Just to avoid doing stuff twice ;) I had to add 2
tiny patches to get it building without the embedded libatomic-ops but
bui
Package: ecl
Version: 9.6.1-1squeeze1
Severity: grave
I am using Debian testing
# uname -a
Linux squeeeze 2.6.32-3-686 #1 SMP Thu Feb 25 06:14:20 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux
When I attempted to install ecl, all goes fine til I get
Setting up ecl (9.6.1-1squeeze1) ...
/usr/lib/common-lisp/bin
./ecl_min
> compile
> | make[2]: *** [bin/ecl] Error 134
strace file shows:
open("/home/sthibault/ecl-10.3.1/src/lsp/helpfile.lsp", O_RDONLY) = 6
mprotect(0x60968000, 16384, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) = 0
lseek(6, 0, SEEK_SET) = 0
read(6, " -*- Mode: L
FYI: The status of the ecl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 9.6.1-1
Current version: 9.6.1-1squeeze1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
Your message dated Mon, 27 Dec 2010 12:32:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#545625: fixed in ecl 9.6.1-1squeeze1
has caused the Debian Bug report #545625,
regarding ecl: FTBFS: rm: cannot remove
`/build/user-ecl_9.8.4-1-amd64-YJh2Lk/ecl-9.8.4/debian/ecl/usr/share/info/dir.old'
; $ rmadison ecl
> [..]
> ecl | 9.6.1-1 | squeeze | source, amd64, armel, hppa, i386,
> ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
> ecl | 9.6.1-1 | sid | source, sparc
> ecl | 9.8.4-1 | sid | source, hppa,
1 - 100 of 200 matches
Mail list logo
