Note: not wearing any partciular hat in this message, opinions are my own.
Helmut Grohne wrote:
Package: src:libsigsegv
Version: 2.10-4
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
libsigsegv FTCBFS for arm64.
Can you confirm that FTCBFS stands for "fails to cross build from sou
peter green wrote:
P.S. i'm currently trying a build as nonroot just in case this is one
of those annoying packages that doesn't like to be built as root
It seems this was indeed the case. The package built successfully when
built a
I maintain raspbian, a Derivative of Debian for the raspberry pi (and in
principle other armv6 devices but in practice the raspberry pi is the
only armv6 device anyone cares about. Note however I do not know any lisp.
Like Debian armhf raspbian uses the armhf dpkg architecture name and the
har
Since the new eglibc was uploaded to unstable I have updated my NMU of
clisp to fix the build failure with it. The old version of the nmu has
been cancelled and the newversion uploaded to delayed/3, i've attatched
the debdiff for the new version of the NMU to this mail.
Again please tell me if
I've prepared a NMU with the patch from sourceforge to prevent crashing
on more modern arm hardware and with debian/* tweaks for armhf.
I've uploaded to delayed/5 with the attatched debdiff. Please tell me if
you have any objections to this NMU so I can change or cancel it.
diff -Nru clisp-2.49
package: clisp
severity: important
x-debbugs-cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
clisp fails to build with a segfault in an armel sid chroot on my
beagleboard XM (armv7). It fails with an illegal instruction error if I
add armhf to the architecture lists, add -marm to the start (if I add it
after
tags 518877 +patch
thanks
The attatched patch makes the package use autoreconf rather than
autoconf so all the autotools stuff is regenerated consistantly.
diff -ur libsigsegv-2.5/debian/control libsigsegv-2.5.new/debian/control
--- libsigsegv-2.5/debian/control 2009-03-21 03:52:53.0
