Bug#601957: .

2010-11-21 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
2010-11-21 22:10:56.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +common-lisp-controller (7.4+nmu2) unstable; urgency=high + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Same as 7.4+nmu1, but also when preinst is invoked with `install' + (hopefully this really closes: #601957). + + -- Serafeim Zanikolas Sun, 2

Bug#601957: pending NMU

2010-11-10 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
ions we have to remove the old auto-generated +file, to avoid config file conflict (Closes: #601957). Setting urgency to +high for RC bug. + + -- Serafeim Zanikolas Mon, 08 Nov 2010 20:13:35 +0100 + common-lisp-controller (7.4) unstable; urgency=low * clc-lisp should run 'clbuild

Bug#601957: pending NMU

2010-11-09 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi again, On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:31:29AM +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote [edited]: > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 03:51, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: > > Hi Desmond, > > > > On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 11:14:07AM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote [edited]: > >> I think the ideal

Bug#601957: pending NMU

2010-11-08 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi Desmond, On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 11:14:07AM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote [edited]: > I think the ideal instead would be to keep lisp-confifg.lisp as a conffile, > but remove it in preinst when upgrading from versions prior to 7.0. Here's an I've tested the patch. Do you

Bug#601957: pending NMU

2010-11-06 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
tag 601957 - pending tag 601957 patch thanks Hi Desmond, On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 03:22:17PM +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote [edited]: > Is it a reasonable patch for the conffile conflict? I think it will > delete the file even if user has modified it. 6.17 (lenny release) creates /etc/lisp-config

Bug#601957: pending NMU

2010-11-05 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
ebian/postinst so +that it is not marked as a conffile, and remove it upon package purge +(Closes: #601957). Setting high urgency for RC bug. + + -- Serafeim Zanikolas Fri, 05 Nov 2010 22:27:19 +0100 + common-lisp-controller (7.4) unstable; urgency=low * clc-lisp should run 'cl