I sent a note to the packaging team [1] to see if we can get some
progress on this issue.
Rupert
[1]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-common-lisp-devel/2012-August/003227.html
___
pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list
pkg-common-lisp-devel@l
At bug #547929[1], there's a request for some actual documentation in
the ecl-doc package. Hunting around, I realised that ECL moved to a new
manual at some point, which no longer lives in the upstream "ecl"
tarballs. You can read the new manual at [2] or there's a git repository
with the source at
Hi,
Since stumpwm is a leaf node in the dependency tree and has an RC
bug[1], it has just been removed from Wheezy. Since I use it, I hunted
around a bit, and it seems that the bug was fixed by the November 2011
upload, although the original reporter didn't confirm this until
mid-December, so mayb
Package: cl-contextl
Severity: minor
Hi,
When doing
$ apt-get source cl-contextl
I get a helpful message:
NOTICE: 'cl-contextl' packaging is maintained in the 'Darcs' version control
system at:
http://darcs.debian.org/darcs/pkg-common-lisp/cl-contextl
This is lovely, but then
$ darcs
Package: cl-aserve
Version: 1.2.42+cvs.2010.02.08-dfsg-1
Severity: serious
After installing cl-aserve (installed for cl-rss), with SBCL
2:1.0.54.0-1, loading it doesn't work because it depends on
cl-acl-compat and cl-htmlgen (see line 74 of the .asd), but these
weren't installed because cl-aserve
Package: sbcl
Version: 1:1.0.47.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
It seems that the location for the core file has changed:
/usr/lib/sbcl/sbcl-dist.core
Fine, but the wrapper binary doesn't seem to know about it:
rupert@hake:~ sbcl
fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 9
Hi,
I tried to write this below the reopen email, but it seems that was the
wrong thing to do. Hopefully, the following text will appear on the bug
report now:
I'm not sure this fixes the problem in all cases. I had a stale
/etc/common-lisp/source-registry.conf.d/common-lisp-controller-userdir.c
Package: common-lisp-controller
Version: 7.0
Upon installing version 7.0 of common-lisp-controller, cl-swank
breaks. (This is using sbcl 1:1.0.31.0-2, cl-swank 1:20090908-1). This
is because swank uses CALCULATE-FASL-ROOT, which was exported by the
older (6.*) versions of clc, but seemingly not b
Peter Van Eynde writes:
>
> Well first of all there is bug-triage and handling. Everybody can change
> the state of bugs in the bts.
Hmm, yes, but "Please package a new version!" isn't a particularly
helpful bug to get :)
> Second I'll write up on how to update huchentoot for example to a new
>
I personally would be extremely happy if (revamped?) versions of the
following packages were in the archive. If I've got it right, these are
basically what's needed for hunchentoot to work.
> Package: cl-cffi
> Package: cl-chunga
> Package: cl-trivial-gray-streams
> Package: cl-flexi-streams
> Pa
Milan Zamazal writes:
> RS> I don't think that debian packages are a waste of time.
>
> It is not, the problem is who will do the work. I definitely prefer a
> small set of well working core CL packages over hundreds of obsolete CL
> packages in a poorly maintained state.
Well, I'm very ha
Peter Van Eynde
writes:
>> I will be there and can try to stir some thing up if need be.
>>
>> Also, I would be willing to help out with packages (though I am not
>> currently a Debian Developer).
>
> Honestly I get the impression that few people care about the packages.
> Most implementations
Peter Van Eynde
writes:
>> After some consideration I must conclude that the state of the Common
>> Lisp packages in Debian is becoming unreasonable. One of the goals of
>> forming the pkg-common-lisp team was that I would not be a
>> bottleneck, as RL is inflicting more and more damage to my 'De
Luca Capello writes:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi there!
>
> As I explained on the pkg-common-lisp-devel@ mailing list, I have no
> more interest in maintaining Parenscript:
>
>
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-common-lisp-devel/2009-July/001337.html
>
> The package
Package: cl-soap
Version: 20060105-2
Severity: serious
The defpackage for :cl-soap, which is installed into
/usr/share/common-lisp/source/cl-soap/src/package.lisp exports the
symbol :wsdl-soal-call rather than :wsdl-soap-call, the correct
name. (The function #'wsdl-soap-call is the final function
Hi,
I've been trying to get hunchentoot up and running "properly" i.e. using
debian packages, rather than pulling source by hand. Unfortunately,
there are some problems
1) hunchentoot has some packaged dependencies that aren't depended upon
by its package:
- cl-bordeaux-threads
- c
16 matches
Mail list logo
