> This is really strange:
...
> Is :SB-CORE-COMPRESSION part of your *features*
no, it isn't.
> and you're using the
> debian binary (easiest to spot if the version in the MOTD has .debian at
> the end)?
yes.
I tried to do the same as you:
$ sbcl --no-sysinit --no-userinit
This is SBCL 1.1.
Hello Jonathan!
On Wednesday 03 August 2011, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Philipp Marek wrote:
> > I think that on sockets, pipes, character devices, and similar there
> > should be _no_ readahead.
>
> On the contrary, on sockets and pipes, readahead is very useful.
> Luckily
Hello everybody,
I'm trying to get SBCL running on some virtual servers.
While running my own scripts is possible when I'm using --dynamic-space-size,
various dpkg activities fail to rebuild the SBCL core image.
There are a lot of similar bug reports ...
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
Hello everybody,
I'm playing around a bit with SBCL, and noticed that the sb-posix package
defines a dirent structure, but without the d_ino member.
Using the inode number to pre-sort the directory before stat()ing the members
can make a
*huge* difference (depending on filesystem, kernel version
Hello everybody,
I'd like to ask whether anyone thought on packaging a FastCGI module for CL.
There's eg.
http://www.cliki.net/FastCGI
and I saw several others, too.
I'd very much like to enhance my LISP, and one nice way would be for web
applications - sadly I cannot use mod_lisp (b
