Bug#693682: marked as done (sbcl: Unable to save compressed core: this runtime was not built with zlib support)

Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2012 04:04:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#693682: fixed in sbcl 2:1.1.1.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #693682, regarding sbcl: Unable to save compressed core: this runtime was not built with zlib support to be marked as done. This means that y

sbcl_1.1.1.0-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:53:38 -0800 Source: sbcl Binary: sbcl sbcl-doc sbcl-source Architecture: source all kfreebsd-amd64 Version: 2:1.1.1.0-2 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team C

Processing of sbcl_1.1.1.0-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes

sbcl_1.1.1.0-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: sbcl_1.1.1.0-2.dsc sbcl_1.1.1.0-2.debian.tar.gz sbcl-doc_1.1.1.0-2_all.deb sbcl-source_1.1.1.0-2_all.deb sbcl_1.1.1.0-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running

Bug#693682: Core compression

Hi! Found the problem.The makefiles aren't handling binary-arch only builds correct so it only works on the architecture the binary was uploaded originally. Fixing in a minute. Thanks for the report! Regards Christoph ___ pkg-common-lisp-devel m

Bug#693682: Core compression

> This is really strange: ... > Is :SB-CORE-COMPRESSION part of your *features* no, it isn't. > and you're using the > debian binary (easiest to spot if the version in the MOTD has .debian at > the end)? yes. I tried to do the same as you: $ sbcl --no-sysinit --no-userinit This is SBCL 1.1.

Bug#693682: Core compression

Hi! This is really strange: > % sbcl > This is SBCL 1.1.1.0.debian, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp. > More information about SBCL is available at . > SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty. > It is mostly in the public domain; some porti