Christoph Egger writes:
> Rupert Swarbrick writes:
>> (1) Does it seem sensible to package the manual as ecl-doc?
>
> I do think so, yes
>
>> (2) If so, since the manual is in a different upstream archive, should
>> the source package be split? (At the moment, the "ecl" source
>> pa
Hi!
Rupert Swarbrick writes:
> (1) Does it seem sensible to package the manual as ecl-doc?
I do think so, yes
> (2) If so, since the manual is in a different upstream archive, should
> the source package be split? (At the moment, the "ecl" source
> package builds both the ecl and
