Re: RFS: common-lisp-controller (updated package)

2010-08-23 Thread Faré
Note that if you upgrade c-l-c, you'll probably want a matching recent asdf (2.005 is best), and a cl-launch that works with it (3.001). Recent c-l-c will NOT work with an older asdf, and older cl-launch will not work with newer asdf. They are very small self-contained programs without anyone else

Re: RFS: common-lisp-controller (updated package)

2010-08-23 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! "Desmond O. Chang" writes: > On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 00:57, Christoph Egger wrote: >>    I guess this is targeted at squeeze? Have you contacted the release >> team already? If not please mail them and explain why you should get a >> freeze exception (looks like that should not be a problem

Re: RFS: common-lisp-controller (updated package)

2010-08-23 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Hi Christoph! On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 00:57, Christoph Egger wrote: > >    I guess this is targeted at squeeze? Have you contacted the release > team already? If not please mail them and explain why you should get a > freeze exception (looks like that should not be a problem to me). If you > have

Re: RFS: stumpwm (updated package)

2010-08-23 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Hi Luca! On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 20:36, Luca Capello wrote: > Hi Desmond! > > On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 02:57 +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote: >> >> Actually, 1.0 has been not recommended.  We have to use many options >> or conffiles to maintain 1.0 packages.  If it is upgraded to 3.0, we >> can use a