Re: uploaded cl-asdf and cl-launch to mentors

2010-08-19 Thread Faré
Also, note that for cl-asdf, I'm currently not using the git repo on alioth (that is slowly bitrotting), but directly the upstream git repo, with tag RELEASE and branch release being used as respective upstream and debian trees in make targets. [ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics

RFS: stumpwm (updated package)

2010-08-19 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:20100709.gitf6262b0-1 of my package "stumpwm". It builds these binary packages: stumpwm- a Common Lisp window manager The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors

RFS: common-lisp-controller (updated package)

2010-08-19 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 7.4 of my package "common-lisp-controller". It builds these binary packages: common-lisp-controller - Common Lisp source and compiler manager The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 593157 The packag

Re: uploaded cl-asdf and cl-launch to mentors

2010-08-19 Thread Faré
On 19 August 2010 04:41, Milan Zamazal wrote: >> "F" == Faré   writes: > >    F> Note that if you already uploaded anything to any official repo, > > Not yet. > >    F> LICENSE is created by the Makefile, and I don't know the correct >    F> way to tell git-buildpackage to ignore it. > > Isn't

Re: RFS: stumpwm (updated package)

2010-08-19 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Hi Luca, On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:19, Luca Capello wrote: > Hi Desmond! > > On Sat, 2010-08-14 at 01:18 +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 05:13, Luca Capello wrote: >> > BTW, these are not complaints, I actually want to understand why you >> > half-switched to source-fo

Bug#593179: common-lisp-controller: clbuild with ccl fails to use user-writable cache for compiled files

2010-08-19 Thread John J. Foerch
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 09:36:20AM -0400, Faré wrote: > The problem is you're still using an old asdf 1.704. Newer c-l-c's > should include a requirement of asdf > 2.000 (a package for 2.005 is > underway), but c-l-c 7.2 is buggy in not declaring such a version > requirement. > Thank you -- Jo

Bug#593179: common-lisp-controller: clbuild with ccl fails to use user-writable cache for compiled files

2010-08-19 Thread John J. Foerch
Error, Undefined function. -- John Foerch On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 05:57:07PM +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote: > What is the value returned by (asdf::compute-output-translations) ? > > Could you provide your operation? > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 08:32, John Foerch wrote: > > Package: common-li

Bug#593179: common-lisp-controller: clbuild with ccl fails to use user-writable cache for compiled files

2010-08-19 Thread Faré
The problem is you're still using an old asdf 1.704. Newer c-l-c's should include a requirement of asdf > 2.000 (a package for 2.005 is underway), but c-l-c 7.2 is buggy in not declaring such a version requirement. [ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] The

Bug#593179: common-lisp-controller: clbuild with ccl fails to use user-writable cache for compiled files

2010-08-19 Thread Desmond O. Chang
What is the value returned by (asdf::compute-output-translations) ? Could you provide your operation? On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 08:32, John Foerch wrote: > Package: common-lisp-controller > Version: 7.2 > Severity: normal > > When clbuild is configured to use ccl (instead of sbcl), during > autoc

Re: uploaded cl-asdf and cl-launch to mentors

2010-08-19 Thread Milan Zamazal
> "F" == Faré writes: F> Note that if you already uploaded anything to any official repo, Not yet. F> LICENSE is created by the Makefile, and I don't know the correct F> way to tell git-buildpackage to ignore it. Isn't it possible to remove it in `clean' target?