Re: RFS: stumpwm (updated package)

2010-08-17 Thread Luca Capello
Hi Desmond! On Sat, 2010-08-14 at 01:18 +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote: > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 05:13, Luca Capello wrote: > > BTW, these are not complaints, I actually want to understand why you > > half-switched to source-format-3.0(quilt) ;-) > > Since I simply use 'pdebuild' without any opt

Bug#177057: Redoing the clisp package, advice wanted

2010-08-17 Thread Sam Steingold
OK, I fixed clisp-link.in and makemake.in (get them from CVS). The relevant part of unix/INSTALL now reads: == 3. Binary package creation: we recommend distributing module "clisp" containing just the base linking set and individual modules packaged sep

Re: uploaded cl-asdf and cl-launch to mentors

2010-08-17 Thread Faré
On 28 July 2010 04:58, Milan Zamazal wrote: >> "F" == Faré   writes: > >    F> Can you or someone please update cl-asdf and cl-launch while it's >    F> still time? > > Done. > I've just uploaded ASDF 2.005 and CL-Launch 3.001. In addition to many minor upstream bug fixes and features, the pac

Bug#177057: Redoing the clisp package, advice wanted

2010-08-17 Thread Sam Steingold
Hi Peter, this is really good news! Thanks! On 8/17/10, Peter Van Eynde wrote: > > Note also that the file clisp/unix/INSTALL has a section "Additional > > Information for Maintainers of Binary Packages" with a "Module > > selection" subsection. I think it would be a good idea for debian to >