Bug#177057: Redoing the clisp package, advice wanted

Hello Sam, I'm redoing the clisp package from scratch to fix long standing issues like: * unnecessary dependencies in clisp-dev: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=504514 * clisp: base/full in clisp-package http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=177057 * clisp: ple

Re: libgc + the ecl situation

On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 22:06:08 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote: > Hi all! > > The ecl package currently is still affected by [0] -- RC bug caused > by a build failure / embedded copy of libgc. The upload to experimental, > where a new enough libgc is already available did improve definitely.

[Thank you] Thanks

Many thanks for your efforts. -- This is message was sent to you from http://thanks.debian.net ___ pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-common-lisp-devel

libgc + the ecl situation

Hi all! The ecl package currently is still affected by [0] -- RC bug caused by a build failure / embedded copy of libgc. The upload to experimental, where a new enough libgc is already available did improve definitely. As I'm going to adopt libgc (do we want it in pkg-common-lisp btw?) I coul

[Thank you] (require :debian)

Thanks for making the best programming language accessible for Debian users.(with-message-to-debian (stream)(loop repeat 1000 do (princ "Thank you!" stream) (terpri stream))) -- This is message was sent to you from http://thanks.debian.net _

a status update

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello all, As you have noticed I was rather busy the last few months. This should improve and I again have a bit of time for some debian work. As I got overwhelmed by the amount of bugs I decided to concentrate on clisp and I'm trying to rework the