Re: Do we need an unofficial debian repository?

Hi there! Thanks to DebConf10, I am catching up with my huge mail backlog, which (obviously) includes pkg-common-lisp as well. On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 22:31 +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote: > The team is inactive now. People's bugreports and patches don't get > any response. Many packages have been

Possible problems in your Debian packages

This is an automated mail. These mails are sent at most twice a month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail === clisp: = 2 Release Goals bug(s): - #530054 clisp-dev: bashism in /bin/sh script Part of re

Re: Bug#591054: cl-asdf: circular dependency with common-lisp-controller

I tried to upload a cl-asdf that removes the dependency, but failed. 1- with the new ASDF2, do we really need to register source anymore, anyway? It should already be registered, being in the correct location that's registered by default. 2- should c-l-c depend on ASDF if ASDF depends on c-l-c?

Processing of cl-asdf_2.004-2_amd64.changes

GnuPG signature check failed on cl-asdf_2.004-2_amd64.changes gpg: Signature made Sun Aug 1 14:49:27 2010 UTC using DSA key ID 7035AAB1 gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found (Exit status 2) /cl-asdf_2.004-2_amd64.changes has bad PGP/GnuPG signature! Removing /cl-asdf_2.004-2_amd64.chang