Re: pan pan pan

2009-08-22 Thread Rupert Swarbrick
Milan Zamazal writes: > RS> I don't think that debian packages are a waste of time. > > It is not, the problem is who will do the work. I definitely prefer a > small set of well working core CL packages over hundreds of obsolete CL > packages in a poorly maintained state. Well, I'm very ha

Re: pan pan pan

2009-08-22 Thread Milan Zamazal
> "RS" == Rupert Swarbrick > writes: RS> I don't think that debian packages are a waste of time. It is not, the problem is who will do the work. I definitely prefer a small set of well working core CL packages over hundreds of obsolete CL packages in a poorly maintained state.

Re: pan pan pan

2009-08-22 Thread Milan Zamazal
> "CL" == Christian Lynbech writes: CL> Is there any way non-DD's can help in the short term? Maybe helping to fix open Debian bugs on packages that you are interested in? CL> Longer term, interested paties should of course sign up as DD's Yes, please. ___

Re: pan pan pan

2009-08-22 Thread Milan Zamazal
> "PVE" == Peter Van Eynde > writes: PVE> I also think that slime should go. Not that I don't think it is PVE> good package that has its use, but because it is just so tricky PVE> to maintain and I never have understood how to debug those PVE> emacs bugs :-(. If you give