Bug#517205: marked as done (cl-swank: Possible DFSG violation in xref.lisp)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:02:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#517205: fixed in slime 1:20090409-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #517205, regarding cl-swank: Possible DFSG violation in xref.lisp to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#517839: marked as done (slime: SLIME fails to upgrade)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:02:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#517839: fixed in slime 1:20090409-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #517839, regarding slime: SLIME fails to upgrade to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Bug#477265: marked as done (cl-swank: typo in swank-loader.lisp creates spurious warnings)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:02:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#477265: fixed in slime 1:20090409-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #477265, regarding cl-swank: typo in swank-loader.lisp creates spurious warnings to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#410856: marked as done (cl-swank: incorrect LOOP in fuzzy-completion-set)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:02:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#410856: fixed in slime 1:20090409-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #410856, regarding cl-swank: incorrect LOOP in fuzzy-completion-set to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#478355: marked as done (emacs-package-install fails to install slime for xemacs21)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:02:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#478355: fixed in slime 1:20090409-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #478355, regarding emacs-package-install fails to install slime for xemacs21 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#457648: marked as done (cl-swank: cannot be loaded from SLIME on SBCL)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:02:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#457648: fixed in slime 1:20090409-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #457648, regarding cl-swank: cannot be loaded from SLIME on SBCL to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

slime override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): cl-swank_20090409-1_all.deb: package says section is devel, override says lisp. slime_20090409-1_all.deb: package says section is devel, override says lisp. Please note that a list of new

slime_20090409-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cl-swank_20090409-1_all.deb to pool/main/s/slime/cl-swank_20090409-1_all.deb slime_20090409-1.diff.gz to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090409-1.diff.gz slime_20090409-1.dsc to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090409-1.dsc slime_20090409-1_all.deb to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090409-1_all.de

Processing of slime_20090409-1_amd64.changes

slime_20090409-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: slime_20090409-1.dsc slime_20090409.orig.tar.gz slime_20090409-1.diff.gz slime_20090409-1_all.deb cl-swank_20090409-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

Bug#507302: not a bug I think...

The ` in bridge.el seems to use the new standard but to fire the warning: (setq bridge-last-failure `((funcall ',handler ',proc ,string) "Caused: " ,err not? Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.co

Bug#474483: xref in swank/slime bug

I cannot reproduce this bug anymore. Do you still have the problem with a recent slime and sbcl? Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson|