On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Juanjo!
>
> On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:41:25 +0200, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That is not something ECL has to provide. It is more a configur
Hi Juanjo!
On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:41:25 +0200, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> That is not something ECL has to provide. It is more a configuration
>>> option that operating systems may provide.
>>
>> Sorry, I'm not a ski
Hi Peter!
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:36:11 +0200, Peter De Wachter wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 01:08:53 +0200
> Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > - utilities.lisp doesn't have an IN-PACKAGE form, so it gets loaded
>> > in whatever random package happens to be active.
>>
>> Since it's load
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 495351 libc6
Bug#495351: ecl: does not install on armel (illegal instruction)
Bug reassigned from package `ecl' to `libc6'.
> found 495351 2.7-13
Bug#495351: ecl: does not install on armel (illegal instruction)
Bug marked as found in version 2
reassign 495351 libc6
found 495351 2.7-13
severity 495351 normal
merge 498008 495351
thanks
Hi Detlef!
On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 10:32:12 +0200, D Schmicker wrote:
> the problem is probably tracked down to a bug in libc6.
>
> Here is the bugreport:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=498
The upstream maintainer suggests the following fix in ecl to work
around this problem
-- Forwarded message --
From: Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sep 5, 2008 11:23 PM
Subject: ARM sigill
To: Martin Guy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Seems I found the problem. His system d
Hi,
the problem is probably tracked down to a bug in libc6.
Here is the bugreport:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=498008
Detlef
___
pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list
pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.al
