Re: CHANGES for next release

2016-05-05 Thread Chris Angelico
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Lance Dillon wrote: > Hmm, probably a typo, documentation says composited-changed for both gtk2 > and 3. Looks like it may have existed since 2.10. I think it probably > hasn't been tested. There are a lot of signals that would be hard to test > without a complex

Re: CHANGES for next release

2016-05-05 Thread Lance Dillon
Hmm, probably a typo, documentation says composited-changed for both gtk2 and 3.  Looks like it may have existed since 2.10.  I think it probably hasn't been tested.  There are a lot of signals that would be hard to test without a complex test. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Thu, May 5

CHANGES for next release

2016-05-05 Thread Peter Bortas @ Pike developers forum
Should any of the following have a CHANGES note?: * ADT.Heap: Added low_peek(). * Fix GTK2.SourceBuffer undo/redo signal names * Fix spelling of composite[d]_changed signal - Is that an API change or where the signals not properly hooked up before? * Crypto/SSL - There is a ton of Crypt

Promises and HTTP

2016-05-05 Thread Mirar @ Pike developers forum
You might want to look into HTTP.Session, since that will handle things like reuse of connections and cookies. (I'm not saying it's intuitive, but it might be a better endpoint than Query for a Concurrent solution.) (Query was never written not to have a layer on top of it.)

Promises and HTTP

2016-05-05 Thread Pontus Östlund
Hi guys! I started experimenting with the new Concurrent.Promise/Concurrent.Future classes and implementing a HTTP client module using the promise/future stuff. The reason for this is that the async stuff in Protocols.HTTP.Query is far from intuitive. With promises/futures I think you get a sup