https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31453255
Pure coincidence? :)
--
Duke
** Text only please. Bottom post works best for me **
On Sat, 21 May 2022 at 09:42, chikega wrote:
>
> I’m a new learner. It's interesting to see results on Google Trend comparing
> various high-level programming languages like Perl, PHP, Ruby, Lua. When I
> punch in 'Pike programming language', I get this: "Hmm, your search doesn't
> have enough
1. I’m a new learner. It's interesting to see results on Google Trend
comparing various high-level programming languages like Perl, PHP, Ruby,
Lua. When I punch in 'Pike programming language', I get this: "Hmm, your
search doesn't have enough data to show here." :-/
https://trends.
On Sat, 21 May 2022 00:02:17 +1000
Chris Angelico wrote:
> My Twitch channel bot runs its own web interface, if that counts.
>
> https://sikorsky.rosuav.com/
>
> I take advantage of Pike features to run that site with real-time
> updates (via websockets) that slide to the latest code every time
On Fri, 20 May 2022 at 23:51, Duke Normandin wrote:
>
> On Fri, 20 May 2022 12:55:32 +0200
> "Stephen R. van den Berg" wrote:
>
> > Duke Normandin wrote:
> > >Awesome! So it seems to me that Pike should be able to give Ruby,
> > >PHP, Perl, Python etc a good run for their money in the Web
> > >ba
I've also written a couple things. A library for interfacing with spacewalk,
and another for nessus security scanner. Plus a few random things here and
there. Mostly quick and dirty things...
On Friday, May 20, 2022, 09:23:10 AM EDT, Duke Normandin
wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2022 12:55
On Fri, 20 May 2022 12:55:32 +0200
"Stephen R. van den Berg" wrote:
> Duke Normandin wrote:
> >Awesome! So it seems to me that Pike should be able to give Ruby,
> >PHP, Perl, Python etc a good run for their money in the Web
> >backends domain.
>
> It does, actually.
It's odd then that Pike is ne
James Latham wrote:
>Thanks for the very informative mailing list that you have created.
>Is there any way to create a distributable pike program?
You forget to specify the target platform.
>Ideally it would be all in one module.
Dropping it inside a minimal docker could be considered a universa
H William Welliver wrote:
>I think there are a lot of lurkers on the general mailing list that are more
>active on the -devel list. My sense is that they tend to not get involved
>unless us lowly level 1 support folk fail to solve the problem ;)
That perhaps, and some of us are caught up in work
Duke Normandin wrote:
>Awesome! So it seems to me that Pike should be able to give Ruby,
>PHP, Perl, Python etc a good run for their money in the Web
>backends domain.
It does, actually.
> So what's kept it from being a strong contender?
>I'm just wondering what's wrong with ti? The docs? The co
10 matches
Mail list logo
