Hi,
The example below is taken from the documentation of ‘struct’ in pil21.
In this case ’struct’ no longer returns the address of the memory region.
With this change misc/rcsim.l no longer runs (I’ve learned it the hard way).
I would like to ask, that this was intentional ?
Thanks,
pahihu
##
Hi Andras,
> The example below is taken from the documentation of ‘struct’ in pil21.
> In this case ’struct’ no longer returns the address of the memory region.
Hmm, yes, this changed a little. Is mentioned in the @doc/diff file.
It is very useful for atomic result specifications, i.e. to derefe
Hi Alex,
Thank you for your explanation.
I will check @doc/diff from now.
pahihu
> On 2021. May 18., at 19:59, Alexander Burger wrote:
>
> Hi Andras,
>
>> The example below is taken from the documentation of ‘struct’ in pil21.
>> In this case ’struct’ no longer returns the address of the memo
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 08:16:28PM +0200, Andras Pahi wrote:
> Thank you for your explanation.
> I will check @doc/diff from now.
And thanks for pointing this out!
I will play with rcsim again :)
☺/ A!ex
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
I see, I had misunderstood the @'s meaning there. Thanks for the
clarification!
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 12:03 AM Alexander Burger
wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 04:53:50PM -0500, polifemo wrote:
> > So, running:
> > (task -5000 (/ @ 5) (tty (println 'a)))
> >
> > does not save in *Run my expec
