Hi, Alex,
On 11.05.21 07:25, Alexander Burger wrote:
>> I tried to remove those few lines and use IPv6-only for some tests, but
>> so far wasn't successful. So I resorted to just use PicoLisp on Linux,
>> which is fine by me ;)
> Can anybody try to find out what else goes wrong?
I will try to fin
hi all,
> pil21 on OpenBSD still works fine, except for networking, because 'port'
> in @lib/net.l creates an IPv6 socket (domain AF_INET6), and then tries
> to set the IPV6_V6ONLY option. This option is read-only in OpenBSD and
> always set to true.
OpenBSD is not tier1 support system and requi
>
> I will try to find out more. The problem is in 'listen' so the 'wait' or
> 'accept'. I can send from PicoLisp to a listening netcat, but sending
> from netcat to a listening PicoLisp hangs.
Please run your code on latest pil21 from now or show us example of code.
BTW, sending over udp works:
On 11.05.21 10:30, Mike wrote:
>>
>> I will try to find out more. The problem is in 'listen' so the 'wait' or
>> 'accept'. I can send from PicoLisp to a listening netcat, but sending
>> from netcat to a listening PicoLisp hangs.
>
> Please run your code on latest pil21 from now or show us example
I haven't followed this list very carefully.
Does picolisp support IPFS?
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Hi Henry!
PicoLisp is turing-complete, so yes picolisp supports everything
computable. /scr
I'm not aware of any picolisp wrappers for IPFS.
IPFS offers a CLI client, CLI clients can used very easily in picolisp.
Alternatives would be: using IPFS C-library in picolisp (if such a
library exist), o
