Re: MiniPicolisp Questions

2020-04-21 Thread Guido Stepken
Hi Kashyap! Dividing up Lisp Cells (Atoms) in RAM/ROM - i think, you're referring to this: https://picolisp.com/wiki/-A265.html has recently got another aspect: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_direct_memory_access RDMA, Remote Direct Memory Access. With Picolisp and especially miniPicoLisp

Re: Replace LLVW - Was: Stop using US controlled software stacks!!!

2020-04-21 Thread Guido Stepken
Hi Alex! Webassembly already is ported to almost all architectures, where browsers are available. All those Webassembly containers in those browsers takes Binary Lisp code and do translate it to native machine code. If you would please have a look at that giant list of programming languages, that

Re: picoLisp 19.12: variable length array in structure fixes

2020-04-21 Thread Mike
hi all, > If you are interested I have patched the 19.12 32bit sources to compile > without GCC. > I have attached the changed files: pico.h, main.c, apply.c and flow.c > > Since clang does not support variable length array in structures I allocate > the bindFrame > with alloca() and provided a

Re: picoLisp 19.12: variable length array in structure fixes

2020-04-21 Thread Andras Pahi
Hi, Maybe not related to this one, but on Mac OS X the heap size is limited to 65532KB. On startup picolisp fails to set the unlimited stack size, And use the actual ulimit so on the first run I’ve got a SIGSEGV running code2015.l Andras > On 2020. Apr 21., at 10:38, Mike wrote: > > hi all,

Re: Replace LLVW - Was: Stop using US controlled software stacks!!!

2020-04-21 Thread George-Phillip Orais
Hi Guido, I am very interested to hear about your ASIC Lispm, how can we avail once its out? Can you please share more details? Actually I am also trying to get back from what we have started using FPGA but time is always not on my side these days, but will see.. I really hope to hear from you ba

Re: picoLisp 19.12: variable length array in structure fixes

2020-04-21 Thread Mike
> Maybe not related to this one, but on Mac OS X the heap size is limited > to 65532KB. On startup picolisp fails to set the unlimited stack size, > And use the actual ulimit so on the first run I’ve got a SIGSEGV running > code2015.l > Indeed! I always forget this requirement on Openbsd. $ ulim

Re: picoLisp 19.12: variable length array in structure fixes

2020-04-21 Thread Guido Stepken
Interesting. You might have also run into no "excution bits" on Intel hardware: https://releases.llvm.org/8.0.1/docs/SpeculativeLoadHardening.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NX_bit In Lisp, "code is data, data is code". There simply is no separation the like - "code here, data there". Typical

Re: MiniPicolisp Questions

2020-04-21 Thread C K Kashyap
Thanks Alex, Yup, I can see what's going on now about RAM vs ROM :) About the the CELL having an additional byte, I meant that the CELL size would be 2*WORD + 1... that should work too right? I would not need any masking in that case. Regards, Kashyap On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:06 PM Alexander

PilCon 2020

2020-04-21 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi all, yesterday the Oktoberfest, the largest annual event in Bavaria, was canceled. I think we will also have to cancel the other large event, PilCon. It is not sure whether such events will be allowed legally by end of July, and how the international travel situation will be. I hope this is O

Re: MiniPicolisp Questions

2020-04-21 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi Kashyap, > About the the CELL having an additional byte, I meant that the CELL size > would be 2*WORD + 1... that should work too right? I would not need any > masking in that case. I see. Yes, that would work. But it would either double the memory usage, or require some management of this add

Re: MiniPicolisp Questions

2020-04-21 Thread C K Kashyap
Thanks Alex, I was thinking of increased memory space - not exactly doubling - I was thinking it would just be one additional byte per CELL. Ofcourse this additional byte would not have the same lifetime of the CELL so it should not need any extra management. I feel encouraged - I'll give it a tr

Re: PilCon 2020

2020-04-21 Thread Jean-Christophe Helary
> On Apr 22, 2020, at 14:00, Alexander Burger wrote: > > Would it make sense to plan an online conference instead? We are playing > around > with Jitsi Meet currently. Any thoughts? You must be aware that the FSF's LibrePlanet was moved from IRL to Jisti (and others) in just a few days of t

Re: PilCon 2020

2020-04-21 Thread Jean-Christophe Helary
> On Apr 22, 2020, at 14:00, Alexander Burger wrote: > > Hi all, > > yesterday the Oktoberfest, the largest annual event in Bavaria, was canceled. > > I think we will also have to cancel the other large event, PilCon. It is not > sure whether such events will be allowed legally by end of Jul

Re: PilCon 2020

2020-04-21 Thread George-Phillip Orais
Same here, as lurker and amateur PicoLisper, I love to join and the attend this online PilCon 2020, thank you Alex! BR, Geo On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 2:47 PM Jean-Christophe Helary < jean.christophe.hel...@traduction-libre.org> wrote: > > > > On Apr 22, 2020, at 14:00, Alexander Burger wrote: >

Re: PilCon 2020

2020-04-21 Thread Edgaras Šeputis
Super lurker here, who just deployed (self hosted) jitsi as part of product we sell. IMO jitsi is quite good, and if self hosting I would have little concerns. Also it is not hard to self host with esp with their docker version, though it currently has a bug with streaming (well due to chrome dropp

Re: PilCon 2020

2020-04-21 Thread Wilhelm Fitzpatrick
I'll add my voice as being another who would be interested in an online convention. -Wilhelm On 4/21/20 11:13 PM, George-Phillip Orais wrote: Same here, as lurker and amateur PicoLisper, I love to join and the attend this online PilCon 2020, thank you Alex! -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@so