On Sun, Aug 06, 2023 at 11:33:32AM +0100, Jason Vas Dias wrote:
> Yes, but please mention something about '(script ...) in the
> main 'ref' "Invocation" Section. It took me a long time to find!
Can you first explain what you are trying to achieve?
'script' in the hashbang line makes no sense to
Yes, but please mention something about '(script ...) in the
main 'ref' "Invocation" Section. It took me a long time to find!
On 06/08/2023, Alexander Burger wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2023 at 07:20:40AM +0100, Jason Vas Dias wrote:
>> Wow ! I've just figured out the best execve(2) Shebang line fo
On Sun, Aug 06, 2023 at 07:20:40AM +0100, Jason Vas Dias wrote:
> Wow ! I've just figured out the best execve(2) Shebang line for pil scripts:
>
> $ cat myscript.l
> #!/usr/bin/pil -script (car (nth (argv) 1)) (nth (argv) 2)
Just for the records, note that
(car (nth Lst 1))
is the same a
Wow ! I've just figured out the best execve(2) Shebang line for pil scripts:
$ cat myscript.l
#!/usr/bin/pil -script (car (nth (argv) 1)) (nth (argv) 2)
(let (ars (car (rest)))
(prinl (car (nth (file) 2)) " ARGS: " (sym ars))
)
(bye)
$ chmod +x myscript.l
$ ./myscript.l
myscript.l A
