ab.de
> Betreff: Re: write from pl-script into named pipe on shell
>
> Hi Olaf,
>
> > Println is not the key, I also played around with flush and sync and tell
> > and every word I saw in rosetta examples :-)
>
> It seems the bash is not fast enough. At least it works
Hi Olaf,
> Println is not the key, I also played around with flush and sync and tell
> and every word I saw in rosetta examples :-)
It seems the bash is not fast enough. At least it works if I put (wait 1000)
between the calls to (out "listener" ..).
This still does not really make sense to me,
Thank you for the quick answer, Alex.
Println is not the key, I also played around with flush and sync and
tell and every word I saw in rosetta examples :-)
But no problem at all - enjoy the weekend :-)
Another approach was to have all different senders and the one receiver
in one picolisp s
Hi Olaf,
just a wild guess, I'm too lazy ATM to try:
> == hey.l ==
> (out "listener" (print 'tput "clear"))
> (out "listener" (print 'tput "cup" 3 15))
> (out "listener" (print 'echo "hey"))
Should it not be 'println' instead of 'print', so that the shell gets a newline
delimiter?
♪♫ Alex
--
U
