Re: strong language for blockchain

2021-05-21 Thread rick
On Fri, 21 May 2021 13:44 -04:00, andr...@itship.ch wrote: > Regarding blockchain.. well the sole purpose of blockchain is to > operate a distribute database AND operate it by different people who > actively mistrust another. This makes it somewhat suited for crypto > currencies like bitcoin, bu

Re: strong language for blockchain

2021-05-21 Thread andreas
Disclaimer: While picolisp community is a very nicely self-selected group of people with interesting views from all paths of life, and most of us are very interested in philosophical discussions and everything else...please let's not go to OT here. PicoLisp is the main topic of this list, and so it

Re: strong language for blockchain

2021-05-21 Thread A. Laszlo Ross
Speaking for myself… as a busted up former US Army special ops officer with a few good braincells… I can guarantee that this new us (us.new) will be both complete bullshit, a project for me to feel like an empowered black trans woman…. *and*…. wait for it… Increasing the ability for the human r

Re: strong language for blockchain

2021-05-21 Thread Yiorgos [George] Adamopoulos
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 8:51 PM wrote: > So in my humble opinion, any real world application of blockchain > technology outside of anti-governmental currency is complete bullshit and > usually just a scheme to get money from fashionable investors and > computer-illiterate governments. Or a pet pr

Re: strong language for blockchain

2021-05-21 Thread A. Laszlo Ross
@beneroth I just read your full email. Wow, that’s really good… Mind if I email you directly if I have a questions? The v1 of this project I’m leading is going to be on a more traditional design but I really want a picoLisp/Android (iOS not necessary) called Universal Syntax. us.new will be th

Re: strong language for blockchain

2021-05-21 Thread Yiorgos [George] Adamopoulos
While I lurk in this mailing list ever since it appeared on lambda-the-ultimate, I still remain a lisp-wanabee of 30 years. On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 9:35 PM A. Laszlo Ross wrote: > This could be strong for blockchain by handing the everyman a cleaner > looking syntax to get power users to become

Re: strong language for blockchain

2021-05-21 Thread A. Laszlo Ross
I’m not a lisp guy at all, so excuse me if this an utter noob question. But… Couldn't picoLisp (or any Lisp really) be written as YAML? I’m not a YAML expert either but it seems like a CAR/CDR implementation at its core. No? This could be strong for blockchain by handing the everyman a cleaner l

Re: strong language for blockchain

2021-05-21 Thread Shaughan Lavine
SJain– A small addition to Beneroth: It is never a good idea to write your own implementations of encryption algorithms if that can be avoided: it is safer to use publically available code used by and checked by many others. Picolisp has good interfaces to various libraries, which makes that str

Re: strong language for blockchain

2021-05-21 Thread andreas
Hi SJain There is no meaningful difference. It doesn't matter if you have a write-able text file or a write-able binary - yes of course text is easier to edit than binary, but that is security by obscurity at best (which is not security). All meaningful cryptographic algorithms are designed to not