Re: Possible bug with prog1 and @

2022-02-09 Thread Kevin Ednalino
That makes sense now. Thanks for the clarification! Kevin On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 1:03 PM Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > > I may have encountered a possible bug, unless my understanding of @ is > > incorrect. It appears the value of @ is not restored in a prog1 body when > > another flo

Re: Possible bug with prog1 and @

2022-02-08 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi Kevin, > I may have encountered a possible bug, unless my understanding of @ is > incorrect. It appears the value of @ is not restored in a prog1 body when > another flow/logic statement occurs as the car of an expression within the This is right. All flow functions which set '@' do *not* bind

Re: Possible bug with prog1 and @

2022-02-08 Thread Wilhelm Fitzpatrick
This behavior seems like it is "as advertised"? I see in the documentation: "Flow- and logic-functions store the result of their controlling expression - respectively non-NIL results of their conditional expression - in @." So the case when (sym? A2) seemingly would not update the current val