Hi Guido!
Thanks for the additional information, very exciting!
On 10.04.20 16:17, Guido Stepken wrote:
> Hi Andreas!
>
> My implementation not really is a pure Lambda calculus, but rather a
> so called "Krivine Machine" that, in fact, consists of 4 instructions,
> als 'subset' of the more univer
Hi Andreas!
My implementation not really is a pure Lambda calculus, but rather a so
called "Krivine Machine" that, in fact, consists of 4 instructions, als
'subset' of the more universal MOV instruction.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krivine_machine
Also see the famous "Landin Machine" with 10 i
Hi Alex!
Yes, indeed! Code typically gets quite large quickly when compiling the
miniPicoLisp into "SISC Code". But luckily your miniPicoLisp was tiny
enough.
But adding a few more Lisp - Instructions to SISC will significantly reduce
the code length. Y-combinator, the "pure Lisper's while loop"
Hi Guido,
> I've succeeded now to design my own CPU. I was curious, how many
> instructions - e.g. from Intel Instruction Set Architecture- i could
> ...
> Only 1 - in words "ONE" - single instruction left: MOV.
Yeah, this single instruction set fascinated me too, since the early 90s when we
talk
>
> Only 1 - in words "ONE" - single instruction left: MOV.
congratulations, you discovered lambda expressions, the fundamental idea
on which the concept of LISP is based.
Thanks for your post, very interesting!
Keep on! Our group of radical IT purists is growing ;-)
This crisis will only increas
Hi all!
miniPicoLisp is a masterpiece of simplicity:
https://github.com/8l/miniPicoLisp/tree/master/src
Now i wanted to know, what the simplest processor could be, that would be
able to run miniPicoLisp.
Inspired by the famous book "From NAND to miniPicoLisp":
https://www.nand2tetris.org/
"Bui
