Hi Pierre,
Pierre Joye in php.windows (Tue, 9 Jul 2013 07:46:48 +0200):
>impersonation should solve this problem. I've to check if another
>function(s) has to be used to get the impersonated user.
Please check it out.
I suppose I will not be the only one interested in running multiple
PHP's with
Jan Ehrhardt in php.windows (Tue, 09 Jul 2013 07:16:49 +0200):
>opcache.mmap_base
>
>Could this be a way out? It looks like this setting overrides the
>setting in ZendOPcache.MemoryBase. What I want is that the OPcache of
>PHP 5.5 does not share the memory with PHP 5.3. Can that be reached by
>sett
Jan Ehrhardt in php.windows (Sun, 07 Jul 2013 22:41:12 +0200):
>I am having troubles configuring multiple PHP-versions, all running
>under Apache 2.4.4 with their own OPcache. My feeling at the moment is
>that under Windows you can only have one PHP instance with OPcache, but
>I would love to be co
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
> Jan Ehrhardt in php.windows (Sun, 07 Jul 2013 22:41:12 +0200):
>>I am having troubles configuring multiple PHP-versions, all running
>>under Apache 2.4.4 with their own OPcache. My feeling at the moment is
>>that under Windows you can only have
Hi Pierre,
Pierre Joye in php.windows (Tue, 9 Jul 2013 19:06:04 +0200):
>On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
>> Hopping back and forth between this list and github. I seem to have a
>> really ugly workaround now. I recompiled the x64 php_opcache.dll after
>> changing the semaphore
On Jul 9, 2013 7:54 PM, "Jan Ehrhardt" wrote:
>
> Hi Pierre,
>
> Pierre Joye in php.windows (Tue, 9 Jul 2013 19:06:04 +0200):
> For what purpose should I use two php.ini's?
> For running two versions
> with their own OPcache? That is what this whole discussion is about (and
> can't be solved wit
Hi Pierre,
Pierre Joye in php.windows (Tue, 9 Jul 2013 22:39:17 +0200):
>On Jul 9, 2013 7:54 PM, "Jan Ehrhardt" wrote:
>> For what purpose should I use two php.ini's?
>
>For having two different settings for x86 and x64. Which is what your patch
>does. You already have two different DLLs.
O, yes
