RE: Re[2]: [PHP-WIN] MySql pconnect

2001-04-16 Thread Svensson, B.A.T.
>The problem here is I believe we are using a different definition of >quality. For me, something is "good" as long as it does what I want it to >do. Ok, I understand what your arguments boils down to now (but my definition is actually exactly the same as yours ;). Let me refine my self: I d

Re: Re[2]: [PHP-WIN] MySql pconnect

2001-04-16 Thread Plutarck
27289C630288B34E@mail1">news:27E647E5629ED211BF78009027289C630288B34E@mail1... > > >-Original Message- > >From: Plutarck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 8:53 AM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: Re[2]: [PHP-WIN] My

RE: Re[2]: [PHP-WIN] MySql pconnect

2001-04-16 Thread Svensson, B.A.T.
>-Original Message- >From: Plutarck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 8:53 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Re[2]: [PHP-WIN] MySql pconnect > > >As expressed in the article, the question is what the database >was designed to

Re: Re[2]: [PHP-WIN] MySql pconnect

2001-04-15 Thread Plutarck
As expressed in the article, the question is what the database was designed to actually "do". MySQL creates quick connections, responds to SELECT statements as fast as anything can, has a small footprint, and does not require any special fees to use it. And yes, it's open source. For the vast maj

Re[2]: [PHP-WIN] MySql pconnect

2001-04-15 Thread Daniel Beulshausen
i'm going to specify at apache now :) Sunday, April 15, 2001, 8:52:59 PM, you wrote: > But my point is that the communication overhead is still gained by process > based systems. True they don't have the same pooling ability, as does a > threaded process management. Overhead saved using pconnec

RE: Re[2]: [PHP-WIN] MySql pconnect

2001-04-15 Thread Svensson, B.A.T.
>-Original Message- >From: Plutarck [] >http://www.webtechniques.com/archives/2001/01/jagielski/ > >Skip down to where it mentions databases...very enlightening. Yeah... MySQL is even a worse RDBM's than I thought since before. No stored procedure, no transactions, no jezus!!! --

Re: Re[2]: [PHP-WIN] MySql pconnect

2001-04-15 Thread Plutarck
http://www.webtechniques.com/archives/2001/01/jagielski/ Skip down to where it mentions databases...very enlightening. I think I may just consider slipping a "p" into my db_connect() function :) -- Plutarck Should be working on something... ...but forgot what it was. "Daniel Beulshausen" <[E

Re[2]: [PHP-WIN] MySql pconnect

2001-04-15 Thread Daniel Beulshausen
Sunday, April 15, 2001, 3:38:48 PM, you wrote: > When you call pconnect when a persistant connection is already available, it > is approximately the same speed as when you call connect for the second time > in a script. It still is a delay. It's not "instant", because PHP has to > check and see if