>The problem here is I believe we are using a different definition of
>quality. For me, something is "good" as long as it does what I want it to
>do.
Ok, I understand what your arguments boils down to now (but my definition
is actually exactly the same as yours ;). Let me refine my self:
I d
27289C630288B34E@mail1">news:27E647E5629ED211BF78009027289C630288B34E@mail1...
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Plutarck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 8:53 AM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: Re[2]: [PHP-WIN] My
>-Original Message-
>From: Plutarck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 8:53 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Re[2]: [PHP-WIN] MySql pconnect
>
>
>As expressed in the article, the question is what the database
>was designed to
As expressed in the article, the question is what the database was designed
to actually "do".
MySQL creates quick connections, responds to SELECT statements as fast as
anything can, has a small footprint, and does not require any special fees
to use it. And yes, it's open source. For the vast maj
>-Original Message-
>From: Plutarck []
>http://www.webtechniques.com/archives/2001/01/jagielski/
>
>Skip down to where it mentions databases...very enlightening.
Yeah... MySQL is even a worse RDBM's than I thought since before.
No stored procedure, no transactions, no jezus!!!
--
http://www.webtechniques.com/archives/2001/01/jagielski/
Skip down to where it mentions databases...very enlightening.
I think I may just consider slipping a "p" into my db_connect() function :)
--
Plutarck
Should be working on something...
...but forgot what it was.
"Daniel Beulshausen" <[E
