Hi,
Pierre Joye wrote:
> Random has no bad or good meaning here. You apply patches that
> upstream (php.net) does not apply, for a given branch.
Yes, but they are not random... There is a very clear process by which
we choose them - and it is not by closing our eyes and pointing a finger ;)
> A
Hi,
Pierre Joye wrote:
> hi,
>
> The only fact that you build 5.2 with VC8 means that you apply patches
> not present in php 5.2 (eventually in 5.3).
Yes, that's true. I include those in the 2nd category of patches we
apply. They should have no effect on any user code.
I am specifically trying
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> There's no any "fork" and nobody ever presented it as "the only usable
> binary distributions for windows".
> Applying patches between releases is how most of binary distros always
> worked (provided there are patches important for thei
Hi!
As being both my concerns are to actually see a kind of fork of PHP,
being presented as the only usable binary distributions for windows
and other platforms (and for apache too).
There's no any "fork" and nobody ever presented it as "the only usable
binary distributions for windows".
Appl
hi,
The only fact that you build 5.2 with VC8 means that you apply patches
not present in php 5.2 (eventually in 5.3).
About moving to VC9 for 5.3, given that we have moved to VC9 and
everything is going well so far, that sounds like a logical move.
But why would you provide your own binaries wi
