hi
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Jorge F. Hernandez wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Does anybody know a way to browse a Samba (smb) server using PHP?
Network paths work just fine with any file functions. If you need
special authentication like domain auth under a different users, then
there are many cl
Hi,
On Thu, 2013-09-05 at 10:46 -0400, Jorge F. Hernandez wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Does anybody know a way to browse a Samba (smb) server using PHP?
>
> Thanks.
>
If files were only I'd be interested on, I'd mount it as a drive on
windows or as a folder on linux.
Regards
Anatol
--
PHP Win
hi,
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 10:29 PM, R. S. wrote:
> Pierre Joye wrote:
>
>> This is
>> definitively a bug in the CRT and I have to discuss that with my
>> colleagues from the vc team.
>
> Ok, so can you look at this bug report and tell me it is really a duplicate:
> https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?
R. S. wrote:
RS ... Just out of curiosity does the problem ranges of alphabets fall outside
>of the limited 'UTF16' range that M$ uses for 'wide strings'. I'm busy out at
an
>exhibition this weekend so only have limited access to my database, but I do
>seem to recall that since wide strings are
Pierre Joye wrote:
> Ok, now I can reproduce it. That's actually weird and have to look at it :)
Thank you!
> Ok, it looks like a found a bug, not in php but in the windows API.
> Which PHP version do you use (newest version uses a different CRT)?
I'm using 5.4.18
Lester Caine wrote:
> RS ...
Did you mean wide character?
I was just flagging up that these are limited range on both M$ and on the
Inprise platforms and some subsets do get missed.
Just a thought as to possible source of problem
Sent from my android device.
hi!
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
> R. S. wrote:
>>
>> if you make files like:
>> testunicode-Ελλάδα or testunicode-Россия
>>
>> Then php can't get handle to these files with errors like:
>
>
> RS ... Just out of curiosity does the problem ranges of alphabets fall
> outsid
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:40 AM, R. S. wrote:
>> Hello Pierre,
>>
>> Friday, August 16, 2013, 5:38:01 AM, you wrote:
>>
>>> and 'TESTUN~1.PHP' has unicode, created using CreateFileW with
>>> 'testunicode-ßäü123-öâ.php' as path. Fetch the 8.3
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:40 AM, R. S. wrote:
> Hello Pierre,
>
> Friday, August 16, 2013, 5:38:01 AM, you wrote:
>
>> and 'TESTUN~1.PHP' has unicode, created using CreateFileW with
>> 'testunicode-ßäü123-öâ.php' as path. Fetch the 8.3 path and use it to
>> open the file using php, works. In othe
R. S. wrote:
if you make files like:
testunicode-Ελλάδα or testunicode-Россия
Then php can't get handle to these files with errors like:
RS ... Just out of curiosity does the problem ranges of alphabets fall outside
of the limited 'UTF16' range that M$ uses for 'wide strings'. I'm busy out at
Hello Pierre,
Friday, August 16, 2013, 5:38:01 AM, you wrote:
> and 'TESTUN~1.PHP' has unicode, created using CreateFileW with
> 'testunicode-ßäü123-öâ.php' as path. Fetch the 8.3 path and use it to
> open the file using php, works. In other words. exactly what your COM
> script does. Now, why y
hi,
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 7:40 PM, R. S. wrote:
> Hello Pierre,
>
> Thursday, August 15, 2013, 10:40:56 AM, you wrote:
>
>> Short paths work just fine. Not sure what goes wrong with the COM APIs
>
> Have you even read my example, or any of my posts before ?
yes.
> There is nothing wrong with
Hello Pierre,
Thursday, August 15, 2013, 10:40:56 AM, you wrote:
> Short paths work just fine. Not sure what goes wrong with the COM APIs
Have you even read my example, or any of my posts before ?
There is nothing wrong with COM API, paradoxically COM works ok
and handles long and short paths ju
hi!
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:15 PM, R. S. wrote:
> Hello Pierre,
>
> Wednesday, August 14, 2013, 10:27:24 AM, you wrote:
>
>> COM is not PHP: You are calling the FileSystemObject's GetFile via COM
>> which uses unicode APIs under the hood. Nothing to do with PHP
>> streams.
>
> Yes, I know that,
Hello Pierre,
Wednesday, August 14, 2013, 10:27:24 AM, you wrote:
> COM is not PHP: You are calling the FileSystemObject's GetFile via COM
> which uses unicode APIs under the hood. Nothing to do with PHP
> streams.
Yes, I know that, and here COM has no issues with unicode.
But in my example COM
hi,
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:09 AM, R. S. wrote:
> The code is provided in this thread and in my (dismissed)
> bug report.
>
> $FS = new \COM('Scripting.FileSystemObject', null, CP_UTF8);
> $FS->CreateTextFile("c:\\Ελλάδα.txt");
> $ShortPath = $FS->GetFile("c:\\Ελλάδα.txt")->Sh
Hello Pierre,
Thursday, August 8, 2013, 7:07:04 AM, you wrote:
> PHP does nothing with the paths a script passes to the IO function.
> The only operation being done is to resolve relative paths and the
> likes but that will only prepend the given path with the current
> directory and remove ../..
hi,
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:41 PM, R. S. wrote:
> Hello Anatol,
>
> Wednesday, July 31, 2013, 12:47:58 AM, you wrote:
>
>> As a dessert I'd suggest you to read this ticket from not very recent past
>> about how it's going in python http://bugs.python.org/issue13247 :)
>
> I tried this in python:
Hello Anatol,
Wednesday, July 31, 2013, 12:47:58 AM, you wrote:
> As a dessert I'd suggest you to read this ticket from not very recent past
> about how it's going in python http://bugs.python.org/issue13247 :)
I tried this in python:
filename = "e:\z_Ελλάδα.txt"
a = open(filename, "w")
Hello Anatol,
Wednesday, July 31, 2013, 12:47:58 AM, you wrote:
> Warning: fopen(ZZ~1.TXT): failed to open stream: Invalid argument in
> Command line code on line 1
> bool(false)
Yes, but how does the function even know that there are multibyte
in it's arguments ? Since it was given the asci
Dear R.S.,
On Tue, July 30, 2013 23:28, R. S. wrote:
> I filled a bug here: https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=65358
> But they dismissed it as duplicate.
> It has nothing to do with these bugs:
> https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=64699
> https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61315
>
>
> Where people tried t
Hello Anatol,
Tuesday, July 30, 2013, 10:13:28 PM, you wrote:
> In addition to the fact that 8.3 names are an issue themselves as they
> might be not present on a particular system,
I don't see any issue if 8.3 are not present. If they don't they don't.
I think then com would even be able to cre
On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 18:53 +0200, R. S. wrote:
> > This is a known issue with 8 bit filenames, please read here
>
> Yes, but 8.3 names are not 8-bit.
In addition to the fact that 8.3 names are an issue themselves as they
might be not present on a particular system, it's about a multibyte name
in
Hello Anatol,
Tuesday, July 30, 2013, 6:32:42 PM, you wrote:
> This is a known issue with 8 bit filenames, please read here
Yes, but 8.3 names are not 8-bit.
> If you work with COM, why don't
> you use it to get the file contents?
I really need a file handle to use with for example
curl which
On Tue, July 30, 2013 00:25, R. S. wrote:
> The thing is these paths do not have any non ascii chars in them. Old 16b
> win311 apps are perfectly fine with such files, they just can't correctly
> show their name nor create a fresh file with non ascii name. And such
> behavior I was expecting from p
To: David Lykke Søndergaard; php-windows@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP-WIN] PHP 5.3/5.4 and windows scripting host, WSF,
ActiveScript question
David,
I don't have my system set up right now as a development machine at the moment
but I did find a couple leads on this. You may have already
David,
I don't have my system set up right now as a development machine at the
moment but I did find a couple leads on this. You may have already seen
these. I hope these are of some help to you. I just did a google on " php
windows script host".
http://wezfurlong.org/blog/2004/jul/phpscri
On 3 January 2013 03:05, findatanet wrote:
>
> I am working on a project to update reporting on a system. On each report,
> the current system uses PHP to make one or more mySQL queries, iterates
> through the query results and manipulates the data, and then generates HTML
> for display. I am ta
Hello Carlo,
I hit issues with PHP 5.4 with an extension for the MapServer project; I
believe the errors/changes could be similar (not Windows specific
however), so you can see the changes in our case needed at
https://github.com/mapserver/mapserver/commit/0d68cd5c06fa97a9d403c11e66d3ab99a16bc78d
Thank you guys, i have solved the problem by changing [name="idschema"] and
by substituing with only .
Now i'm able to select a value from the dropdown list menu and to deliver
it across the page. :-)
Thank you and have a nice day!
Matt.
2012/9/15 Niel Archer
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > i have a
> Hi folks,
>
> i have a problem with a value that it is not passed as POST variable from a
> php page to another.
> this is the error i have encountered :
>
> *Notice*: Undefined index: idschema in *\SubmitSchema.php* on line *22*
>
> Follow the code of the main page :
> ---
unsubscribe
Gavin,
You could try www.fpdf.org, this is a PDF generator written in PHP, so should
be used by any hosting company.
Regards,
Neil Morgan PGCert MSc
IT Services
University of Brighton
Watts 137
Lewes Road
Brighton
BN2 4GJ
01273 643930
-Original Message-
From: Gavin [mailto:gavin.ch
hi,
tcpdf, fpdf, etc. There are plenty of PHP (scrtipt) library to generate pdf.
Cheers,
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Gavin wrote:
> Hi all, not sure if this is the right list.
>
> I am looking for a PHP to PDF script/help, but I have just contacted my host
> company and been advised they d
I am getting error on
Fatal error: Class 'registryDatabaseLocations'.
2nd problem is when I run code by commenting
>> o_CrReport->Database->LogOnServer
>> (
>> 'odbc',
>> 'Ac// Logon to the database.
>> $counts',
>> registryDatabaseLocations::Database('Accounts'),
>>
Luhana,
What is line 19?
Please show the coding
On 23/12/2011 01:26, luhana wrote:
Dear Sir
I am getting error
Fatal error: Class 'registryDatabaseLocations' not found in
C:\wamp\www\cc3.php on line 19
please guide
Richard Quadling wrote:
2009/4/30 John Messam:
I am trying to write a php
Dear Sir
I am getting error
Fatal error: Class 'registryDatabaseLocations' not found in
C:\wamp\www\cc3.php on line 19
please guide
Richard Quadling wrote:
>
> 2009/4/30 John Messam :
>>
>> I am trying to write a php program that opens a number of reports written
>> in Crystal 11. From resea
Pierre Joye wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
Pierre Joye wrote:
Yes Pierre - on the larger systems we run multiple machines, but on sites
that only require a single computer, a single clean stack is also
nice, with
everything in the one base directory and with
Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
? I'm running the full stack on windows as 64 bit code and seeing a
performance improvement over the 32bit version.
we are talking about your whole stack, as you didn't ran benchmarks using 32bit
php vs 64bit php.
I haven't rolled back just part ... in fact I have y
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
> Pierre Joye wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes Pierre - on the larger systems we run multiple machines, but on sites
>>> > that only require a single computer, a single clean stack is also
>>> > nice, with
>>> > everything in the one base directory and wit
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
> Pierre Joye wrote:
>
>> Yes Pierre - on the larger systems we run multiple machines, but on sites
>>> > that only require a single computer, a single clean stack is also
>>> nice, with
>>> > everything in the one base directory and without
Pierre Joye wrote:
Yes Pierre - on the larger systems we run multiple machines, but on sites
> that only require a single computer, a single clean stack is also nice, with
> everything in the one base directory and without the agro of deciding if
> this is a 32bit or 64bit program. Everything
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
> Yes Pierre - on the larger systems we run multiple machines, but on sites
> that only require a single computer, a single clean stack is also nice, with
> everything in the one base directory and without the agro of deciding if
> this is a 32
Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
did you checked your "Program Files (x86)" directory lately?
for windows it is common that there are apps without 64bit versions. :(
If these machines had to run anything other than the Apache/PHP/Firebird stack
that might be relevant, but my hands are tied by the customer
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
> Mixing 32bit and 64bit just seems totally wrong to me ...
There is nothing wrong here but a totally normal configuration.
If one takes care of performances, the database server(s) are separate
servers anyway. And they are totally unrelated
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
> Pierre Joye wrote:
>
>> hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Lester Caine
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Keith Davis wrote:
>>>
> From everything that I've heard, there is not much benefit to a x64
>
binary for PHP.
>>
Pierre Joye wrote:
hi,
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
Keith Davis wrote:
From everything that I've heard, there is not much benefit to a x64
binary for PHP.
Running all 64bit including the database, I'm seeing a reasonable
performance improvement over a pure 32 bi
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Tomasz Krawczyk wrote:
> I was also thinking about x64 php.
> Guys, you said that 64 bit PHP is slightly slower than 32 bit, but there
> might be areas where x64 will be faster. Let's imagine site basing on image
> or video processing. That kind of site could take
W dniu 2011-10-16 16:07, Pierre Joye pisze:
hi Justin!
Well, right. The only advantage is the largest maximal available
memory. But I'd to say that if one is processing GB of XML data using
DOM, then he should seriously consider xmlreader and xmlwriter. They
are stream based parser and used a co
hi Justin!
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Justin Dearing wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
>
>> PHP is slower in 64bit than in 32bit modes. Databases (be oracle,
>> mysql or other) are another stories and many of them are faster.
>> However one does not have to run p
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> PHP is slower in 64bit than in 32bit modes. Databases (be oracle,
> mysql or other) are another stories and many of them are faster.
> However one does not have to run php in 64bit mode to talk to database
> servers running in 64bit mode.
>
>
hi,
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
> Keith Davis wrote:
>>>
>>> From everything that I've heard, there is not much benefit to a x64
>>
>> binary for PHP.
>
> Running all 64bit including the database, I'm seeing a reasonable
> performance improvement over a pure 32 bit set-u
Agreed on the DB side. We run MySQL x64.
One area I could see using an x64 binary is that we run Wincache and I could
see a scenario in wanting to use more RAM than 32 bit will allow.
Sent from my all-powerful iPhone 4,
Keith Davis 214-906-5183
On Oct 15, 2011, at 5:57 PM, "Ferenc Kovacs" wro
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
> Keith Davis wrote:
>
>> From everything that I've heard, there is not much benefit to a x64
>>>
>> binary for PHP.
>>
>
> Running all 64bit including the database,
yeah, running the database servers on 64bit is a must, mostly because of th
Keith Davis wrote:
From everything that I've heard, there is not much benefit to a x64
binary for PHP.
Running all 64bit including the database, I'm seeing a reasonable performance
improvement over a pure 32 bit set-up on the same AMD 64bit hardware using 64bit
vista order of 10 to 15% faste
Saturday, October 15, 2011 12:00 PM
To: php-windows
Subject: Re: [PHP-WIN] PHP 64-bit binaries?
Ivan Cenov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am searching for PHP binaries for Windows 64-bit.
> It seems that such binaries are not supported officially at
http://php.net.
> There is some old unoffic
Ivan Cenov wrote:
Hello,
I am searching for PHP binaries for Windows 64-bit.
It seems that such binaries are not supported officially at http://php.net.
There is some old unofficial binaries in the net.
http://www.anindya.com/ is the current up to date source and links to a small
library of 64
On 19 August 2011 21:18, James Crow wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:12:21 +0100, Richard Quadling
> wrote:
>> On 19 August 2011 19:28, James Crow wrote:
>>> On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:30:27 +0100, Richard Quadling
>>>
>>> wrote:
On 19 August 2011 17:13, James Crow wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Aug
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:12:21 +0100, Richard Quadling
wrote:
> On 19 August 2011 19:28, James Crow wrote:
>> On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:30:27 +0100, Richard Quadling
>>
>> wrote:
>>> On 19 August 2011 17:13, James Crow wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:33:43 +0100, Richard Quadling
wrote
On 19 August 2011 19:28, James Crow wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:30:27 +0100, Richard Quadling
> wrote:
>> On 19 August 2011 17:13, James Crow wrote:
>>> On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:33:43 +0100, Richard Quadling
>>>
>>> wrote:
On 19 August 2011 16:16, James Crow wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:30:27 +0100, Richard Quadling
wrote:
> On 19 August 2011 17:13, James Crow wrote:
>> On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:33:43 +0100, Richard Quadling
>>
>> wrote:
>>> On 19 August 2011 16:16, James Crow wrote:
Hi all,
I am using the SOAP client to retrieve data from a
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:33:43 +0100, Richard Quadling
wrote:
> On 19 August 2011 16:16, James Crow wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am using the SOAP client to retrieve data from a web server. One
field
>> in the returned object is a text string that may contain embedded
>> carriage
>> returns. If I look
On 19 August 2011 16:16, James Crow wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am using the SOAP client to retrieve data from a web server. One field
> in the returned object is a text string that may contain embedded carriage
> returns. If I look at the raw packets they appear as '
' in the string.
> When I get the
-Original Message-
From: Jeff McKenna [mailto:jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com]
Hello everyone,
I see that the PHP Wiki has been down, and I want to access the
wonderful StepByStepBuild instructions there
(http://wiki.php.net/internals/windows/stepbystepbuild). (I even
contributed to that
Keeping the wiki up to date would not be too hard to set up if changes
are committed on one master and synchronized to all slaves. I already
did that for one of my customers and it worked like a charm :)
Regards,
Sascha
P.S. I would also love to see the PHP wiki back online!
Am 01.04.2011 21
None that I'm aware of. Having some mirrors would be ideal, but since it's
a wiki keeping them synchronized would probably be a nightmare.
Do we have an ETA on getting the wiki back up yet?
--Kris
-Original Message-
From: Jeff McKenna [mailto:jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com]
Sent: F
>
> --Kris
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 11:33 AM
> To: Sascha Meyer
> Cc: Curtis Tammany; php-windows@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-WIN] PHP Startup: Unable to init
post a link here, and I'd be happy to
take a look. =)
--Kris
-Original Message-
From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 11:33 AM
To: Sascha Meyer
Cc: Curtis Tammany; php-windows@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-WIN] PHP Startup: Unable to ini
Hi Pierre,
Could you check which php.ini is loaded via phpinfo()? I assume you have a
php.ini somewhere in your Windows directory pointing to the wrong directory.
For what I see in the error, it is the other way 'round. 5.2 is loaded
and trying to load 5.3 extensions.
right, httpd.conf points to
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Sascha Meyer wrote:
> Could you check which php.ini is loaded via phpinfo()? I assume you have a
> php.ini somewhere in your Windows directory pointing to the wrong directory.
For what I see in the error, it is the other way 'round. 5.2 is loaded
and trying to loa
Could you check which php.ini is loaded via phpinfo()? I assume you have
a php.ini somewhere in your Windows directory pointing to the wrong
directory.
@Pierre: thanks for the internal info about how to identify 5.2 vs 5.3
extension, I didn't have a clue about how to interpret the module API
ok. Let me start it again from scratch.
[30-Mar-2011 12:09:59] PHP Warning: PHP Startup: bz2: Unable to initialize
module
Module compiled with module API=20090626, debug=0, thread-safety=1
PHPcompiled with module API=20060613, debug=0, thread-safety=1
API=20060613 IS php 5.2, period. See:
h
This is how it is in httpd.conf:
#BEGIN PHP INSTALLER EDITS - REMOVE ONLY ON UNINSTALL
PHPIniDir "C:/PHP536/"
LoadModule php5_module "C:/PHP536/php5apache2_2.dll"
#END PHP INSTALLER EDITS - REMOVE ONLY ON UNINSTALL
AddType application/x-httpd-php .php
I had to upgrade to Apache 2.2.17 as it was t
Again, that's simply not the case. We did check the packages. Double
check your config and be sure that a) you actually use 5.3.6 and b)
that you actually load 5.3's exts.
Cheers,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Curtis Tammany wrote:
> All of the files came from php-5.3.6-Win32-VC9-x86.msi
>
>
All of the files came from php-5.3.6-Win32-VC9-x86.msi
Check your package...
"Pierre Joye" wrote in message
news:AANLkTinJ=y4UJ3nRax=jx1unophn6k2gcklr4bc7v...@mail.gmail.com...
sorry but you are. See the API versions.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Curtis Tammany
wrote:
> I had to upgrade
Dnia 30-03-2011 o 19:33:58 "Curtis Tammany"
napisał(a):
I had to upgrade to PHP 5.3.6 on a Windows environment.
That was ONLY available on windows.php.net as a VC9 version (downloaded
the
Thread-safe installer)
All of the dlls in the ext folder came with PHP 5.3.6
I'm not mixing versions.
sorry but you are. See the API versions.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Curtis Tammany wrote:
> I had to upgrade to PHP 5.3.6 on a Windows environment.
> That was ONLY available on windows.php.net as a VC9 version (downloaded the
> Thread-safe installer)
> All of the dlls in the ext folder came
I had to upgrade to PHP 5.3.6 on a Windows environment.
That was ONLY available on windows.php.net as a VC9 version (downloaded the
Thread-safe installer)
All of the dlls in the ext folder came with PHP 5.3.6
I'm not mixing versions..
"Pierre Joye" wrote in message
news:AANLkTi=zkyY58WSghM9d=
hi,
Module compiled with module API=20090626, debug=0, thread-safety=1
PHPcompiled with module API=20060613, debug=0, thread-safety=1
To me it looks like you are trying to load a php 5.3 extension using php 5.2.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Curtis Tammany wrote:
> Hello-
>
> I've finn
Hi Curtis,
Curtis wrote:
I've finnally got PHP 5.3.6 running under Apache 2.2.17 (on Windows). PHP
came from windows.php.net.
...
All of the DLLs are in the ext folder and extension_dir is set correctly.
The VC9 redistributable is also installed.
What is going on??
Just have a look at the side
hi,
Can you open a bug at bugs.php.net please?
Thanks,
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Lars Mueller wrote:
> Hi
>
> Has anyone had the following problem using the installer to install PHP as
> an apache module?
>
> When installing, the http.conf is modified, but it leaves the path blank:
> BEG
On 18 November 2010 13:07, Richard Quadling wrote:
> On 18 November 2010 12:44, Pierre Joye wrote:
>> It is not about the binaries working well or not. It is about binary
>> compatibility. It does not matter if you build everything yourself and
>> does not rely on php.net's binaries, but it does
On 18 November 2010 12:44, Pierre Joye wrote:
> It is not about the binaries working well or not. It is about binary
> compatibility. It does not matter if you build everything yourself and
> does not rely on php.net's binaries, but it does if you have to build
> extensions to be used with PHP.net
It is not about the binaries working well or not. It is about binary
compatibility. It does not matter if you build everything yourself and
does not rely on php.net's binaries, but it does if you have to build
extensions to be used with PHP.net's releases.
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Richard
ith php.net's binary.
> - Show quoted text -
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Justin Dearing wrote:
>> Meant to reply to everyone
>>
>>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: Justin Dearing
>> Date: Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:
at 9:53 PM, Justin Dearing wrote:
> Meant to reply to everyone
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Justin Dearing
> Date: Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [PHP-WIN] PHP 5.3.4 has built
> To: Pierre Joye
>
>
> So wait we can use the Win
hi,
Nice, finally! :)
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Steven Scott wrote:
> Thanks to everyone for the help. I created a new image with Visual
> Studio 2008 Express. Added the Windows 7.0 SDK and then configured
> the system to use that version. Followed the build instructions, and
> I now h
The tag is being rendered between the { and } tags inside PHP tags
related to the conditional statement, so if the conditional statement isn't
true, even static HTML inbetween them won't show up.
Stay well
Jacob Kruger
Blind Biker
Skype: BlindZA
'...fate had broken his body, but not his spiri
> -Original Message-
> From: stao [mailto:s...@china4d.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 8:49 PM
> To: php-windows@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP-WIN] php conditionals?
>
> Hi,
>
> I saw php usage like below somewhere. I kind of wonder why the page
> does not display anything. in
2010/8/22 Tomasz Krawczyk :
> On some pages I see extensions builds for every PHP release. Let say
> extension abc-1.2.3-php-5.3.0, abc-1.2.3-php-5.3.1 and so on. On other pages
> I see extension builds for every minor PHP version f.e. xyz-9.8.7-php5.0,
> xyz-9.8.7-php5.1 and so on.
>
> Extensions
.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 11:00 AM
To: Pierre Joye
Cc: php-windows@lists.php.net; Ferenc Kovacs; Steven Scott
Subject: RE: RE: [PHP-WIN] PHP Debugger for Windows?
Yea, I would think not. In fact, I started testing this and I am getting
a very strange result. Here is the link that I downlo
om]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 10:43 AM
To: Keith Davis
Cc: php-windows@lists.php.net; Ferenc Kovacs; Steven Scott
Subject: Re: RE: [PHP-WIN] PHP Debugger for Windows?
It can't work, maybe you fetched the 32b version.
On 3 Aug 2010 16:20, "Keith Davis"
wrote:
It can't work, maybe you fetched the 32b version.
On 3 Aug 2010 16:20, "Keith Davis" wrote:
I don't need performance, but I need it to not take 5x longer to load. I
work too darn fast for this thing. I can debug most things procedurally
much faster. So, I only use the debugger when I can't do it
> From: ak...@telkomsa.net
> To: aj...@alumni.iu.edu; php-windows@lists.php.net
> Subject: RE: [PHP-WIN] PHP Debugger for Windows?
> Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 16:53:23 +0200
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alice Wei [mailto:aj...@alumni.iu.edu]
> Sent: 03 Augu
-Original Message-
From: Alice Wei [mailto:aj...@alumni.iu.edu]
Sent: 03 August 2010 04:33 PM
To: a...@dotcontent.net; php-windows@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP-WIN] PHP Debugger for Windows?
Thanks for your pointer, I have downloaded the trial version and started to
play around with
-Original Message-
From: Keith Davis [mailto:keithda...@pridedallas.com]
Sent: 03 August 2010 04:24 PM
To: a...@dotcontent.net; Ferenc Kovacs; Steven Scott
Cc: php-windows@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP-WIN] PHP Debugger for Windows?
Ah, and XDebug is completely free. Always a plus
> From: ak...@telkomsa.net
> To: aj...@alumni.iu.edu; php-windows@lists.php.net
> Subject: RE: [PHP-WIN] PHP Debugger for Windows?
> Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 13:38:21 +0200
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alice Wei [mailto:aj...@alumni.iu.edu]
> Sent: 03 August
Ah, and XDebug is completely free. Always a plus.
Keith Davis (214) 906-5183
-Original Message-
From: Arno Kuhl [mailto:ak...@telkomsa.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 9:22 AM
To: Keith Davis; 'Ferenc Kovacs'; 'Steven Scott'
Cc: php-windows@lists.php.net
Subjec
teven Scott'
Cc: php-windows@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP-WIN] PHP Debugger for Windows?
-Original Message-
From: Keith Davis [mailto:keithda...@pridedallas.com]
Sent: 03 August 2010 04:07 PM
To: Ferenc Kovacs; Steven Scott
Cc: php-windows@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP-WIN] PHP Debug
-Original Message-
From: Keith Davis [mailto:keithda...@pridedallas.com]
Sent: 03 August 2010 04:07 PM
To: Ferenc Kovacs; Steven Scott
Cc: php-windows@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP-WIN] PHP Debugger for Windows?
Testing the 2.1.0 x64 DLL and it seems much more stable...though, still
1 - 100 of 1222 matches
Mail list logo
