Sorry, I should clarify,
I am using a postgres database on slack for my local user data (I have
not ported it w2000 machine), but the site talks to an AS400 for its
main data that customers are looking for.
As far as I can tell, the files that fail to include are random (all you
have to do is
Huh. 16 Gigs I presume. How did you set this machine up or did someone
else set it up?
I find it a bit odd that you can run the DB just fine on slack but can't
access it well from php/slack. Oh well.
Is there any pattern in the files' reluctance to be include()'d or is it
just random? Do they fa
It is a single processor PII box with an IDE drive (16mb). The box is
sitting on the other side of the country from me, so I do not know the
exact specs. The database is still runninng on our Slack box (pg 7.1),
a very beefy dual PIII IBM eServer.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hmm. What's the h
Hmm. What's the horsepower in the machine? It seems as if it should be
enough. Is the database running on that machine or a separate one? What
about the disk interface?
I'm running out of suggestions...
-Dash
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Michael Baron wrote:
> This server is running two of our lowest
This server is running two of our lowest volumne applications.
The main one only sees about 150 logins a day and each one lasts about
20-30 minutes of page viewing(it is only released to our largest customers).
The other one sees about 1500 hits a day.
It is running on a little dell desktop wi
I figured there had to be a good reason. At least you're still using
Apache :) Forgive me for suggesting you rip out Apache 1.3.x and replace
it with Apache2.
Just out of curiosity, how busy is this website?
-Dash
186,282 miles per second:
It isn't just a good idea, it's the law!
On Tue, 10 S
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Are you serious about using Apache 1.3.6? Yowser that's old!!! I'd update
> to Apache 2 and PHP 4.2.3 right away!
>
> I've had no problems on my Win2k (workstation) using Apache 2.0.39 and PHP
> 4.2.2. What are the specs on the hardware?
>
> And why'd you move from sl
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>>Are you serious about using Apache 1.3.6? Yowser that's old!!! I'd update
>>to Apache 2 and PHP 4.2.3 right away!
>
>
> Apache 1.3.x is fine. I'd upgrade to a later version of Apache 1.3
> though. Apache 2 with PHP is not ready yet.
>
> -Rasmus
>
I apologize, I mean I
> Are you serious about using Apache 1.3.6? Yowser that's old!!! I'd update
> to Apache 2 and PHP 4.2.3 right away!
Apache 1.3.x is fine. I'd upgrade to a later version of Apache 1.3
though. Apache 2 with PHP is not ready yet.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To uns
Are you serious about using Apache 1.3.6? Yowser that's old!!! I'd update
to Apache 2 and PHP 4.2.3 right away!
I've had no problems on my Win2k (workstation) using Apache 2.0.39 and PHP
4.2.2. What are the specs on the hardware?
And why'd you move from slackware?
-Dash
When I was a boy I wa
10 matches
Mail list logo
