se are my personal findings... feel free to comment back. I'm always
open to trying new methods of deployment.
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Carr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 10 June 2002 8:50 PM
> To: Matt Babineau
> Cc: PHP Windows
> Subject: RE: [PHP-
ndings... feel free to comment back. I'm always open to trying
new methods of deployment.
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Carr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 10 June 2002 8:50 PM
> To: Matt Babineau
> Cc: PHP Windows
> Subject: RE: [PHP-WIN] Re: Apache 2.0.36
>From what I understand, there is support for SSL just not in the Binary form of
Apache 2.0. You have to compile it yourself. The reason being is US export
laws of encryption stuff. The Apache Group is very if'y when it comes to that.
With DMCA and such laws, I can understand why.
--
Scott Ca
ver I'd be dubious as
to how stable apache2 would be just now, and would personally stick with 1.3
My 2cents
Ross
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Hurring [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 10 June 2002 20:25
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PHP-WIN] Re: Apache
Well, just IMO, i've used PHP/apache on both linux and windows
for almost 2 years now, and i've never had a single problem with
either platform.
I personally prefer using linux for server jobs and windows for
desktop jobs so i don't think i'd ever use windows as a
production server, but I do
Yeah Scott, that's also what I have been hearing. I am wondering though
is the PHP support in Apache 1.3 or 2.0 even on Windows the same type of
support that you would get on a Linux machine? I am not a Linux person
but I may need to be if I can't get good performance out of Windows. I
am a Window
