Re: [PHP-WIN] ISAPI Status

2001-12-16 Thread Alain Sayez
I'm currently using PHP 4.1.0 and ISAPI module under IIS 5.0, W2K Server and I have no problem. Some differences between ISAPI and CGI, ISAPI doesn't recognize $REMOTE_USER. I use the new $_SERVER["REMOTE_USER"] instead. It works ! Alain Sayez "Michael Sims" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in messag

RE: [PHP-WIN] ISAPI Status

2001-12-15 Thread Michael Sims
At 06:07 PM 12/15/2001 +, Jeff Waldock wrote: >For what it's worth, I have been running PHP ISAPI (versions 4.0.6 and >earlier) on Win2k and WinNT4 (SP6) for quite a while - 12 months and approx >2 years, respectively, and have had not a single problem - totally >fault-free. I have to say tha

RE: [PHP-WIN] ISAPI Status

2001-12-15 Thread Jeff Waldock
chael Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 December 2001 02:25 To: Flint Doungchak; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PHP-WIN] ISAPI Status At 12:27 PM 12/14/2001 -0800, Flint Doungchak wrote: >I was just wanting to see what people are experiencing with the ISAPI module >for IIS 5.0 with PHP

Re: [PHP-WIN] ISAPI Status

2001-12-14 Thread Michael Sims
At 03:58 AM 12/15/2001 +0100, Tommy Finsen wrote: >I think I'll wait for a few iterations before I give it another try. >Luckily I have the HW to run PHP in CGI :). IIS5 with PHP in CGI-mode is >rock stable. Been running it for 10 months with NO downtime (except when >upgrading). Thanks for the i

Re: [PHP-WIN] ISAPI Status

2001-12-14 Thread Tommy Finsen
-Original Message- From: Michael Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Flint Doungchak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, php- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 20:24:56 -0600 Subject: Re: [PHP-WIN] ISAPI Status > At 12:27 PM 12/14/2001 -0800, Flint Doungchak wrote: > >I was jus

Re: [PHP-WIN] ISAPI Status

2001-12-14 Thread Michael Sims
At 12:27 PM 12/14/2001 -0800, Flint Doungchak wrote: >I was just wanting to see what people are experiencing with the ISAPI module >for IIS 5.0 with PHP 4.1.0. Sorry I don't have an answer to your question, but just a related question of my own. I've seen lots of people refer to 4.1.0 as "final