On Friday, June 14, 2002, 11:07:24 AM, Brian McGarvie wrote:
> Basically then there is no real reason for Apache over IIS on win2k server?
Not now Apache 2 is here. Apache 1.x has always been considered by the Apache
group as beta code and therefore not suitable for use in a production
environmen
ase serving machines - databases
primarily MsSQL/Access/MySQL.
Btw, thanks Stuart, thats kinda making me feel easier about keeping it IIS.
> -Original Message-
> From: Stuart Dallas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 14 June 2002 10:52 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECT
On Friday, June 14, 2002, 9:13:59 AM, Brian McGarvie wrote:
> How does IIS fair against Apache with servring multiple sites? each site will be
>like... http://customername.ourdomain.co.uk
Both are capable of serving multiple sites without any issues that I am aware
of.
> Also - more an IIS/Apac
Right...
Back to the old bombshell of which webserver...
I have'nt seen any reports which say what is better...
Here is my issue:
The webserver I am setting up will potentially host 4 or 5 sites...
How does IIS fair against Apache with servring multiple sites? each site will be
like... http:
